Tom LUKIWSKI

LUKIWSKI, Tom

Personal Data

Party
Conservative
Constituency
Moose Jaw--Lake Centre--Lanigan (Saskatchewan)
Birth Date
October 5, 1951
Website
http://tomlukiwski.ca
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=fe517b95-bc62-4fe8-96aa-998994aefd48&Language=E&Section=ALL
Email Address
tom.lukiwski@parl.gc.ca
Profession
businessman, political administrator

Parliamentary Career

June 28, 2004 - November 29, 2005
CPC
  Regina--Lumsden--Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)
January 23, 2006 - September 7, 2008
CPC
  Regina--Lumsden--Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform (February 7, 2006 - November 6, 2008)
October 14, 2008 - March 26, 2011
CPC
  Regina--Lumsden--Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform (February 7, 2006 - November 6, 2008)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (November 7, 2008 - October 18, 2015)
May 2, 2011 - August 2, 2015
CPC
  Regina--Lumsden--Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (November 7, 2008 - October 18, 2015)
May 2, 2011 -
CPC
  Regina--Lumsden--Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (November 7, 2008 - October 18, 2015)
October 19, 2015 -
CPC
  Moose Jaw--Lake Centre--Lanigan (Saskatchewan)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 5 of 704)


November 5, 2018

Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, CPC)

Mr. Speaker, I want to set the record straight for both the members of the NDP and the government side regarding the closure of nine Veterans Affairs offices by the former Conservative government.

While it is true that nine offices were closed, all of the staff in those offices were transferred to Service Canada locations within the same ridings. In fact, because of that, all of the Service Canada outlets were then able to provide services to veterans without those veterans having to go to a regional office.

Here is a concrete example. In Saskatchewan, prior to the change that made veterans services part of the core responsibilities of Service Canada, there were only two regional Veterans Affairs offices, one in Saskatoon and one in Regina. That meant that anyone who wanted to go speak in person to an official in a Veterans Affairs office had to travel to one of those two centres. We are a rule-based economy. We are also a rule-based province. I spoke to several veterans who had to make the trek from Estevan to Regina or Saskatoon, which is sometimes two to two and a half hours to get to an office. When we made the change to incorporate veterans services into Service Canada that meant that in almost every mid-sized town in Saskatchewan, there was a Service Canada official prepared and trained—

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Business of Supply
Full View Permalink

October 31, 2018

Mr. Tom Lukiwski

Mr. Speaker, I would like to point out that I heard, unless my ears are playing tricks on me, you recognize my colleague from Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan. The reason I rose on a point of order is because in the first intervention by my colleague, he said he would be splitting his time with the member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan. I was anticipating my colleague who sits directly behind me to stand and start speaking. Once I heard you recognize him, I also noticed that my colleague from Mégantic—L'Érable started speaking. That is why I rose on a point of order.

Mr. Speaker, you can check the audiotapes. I would not have risen in my place on a point of order, had I not, first, heard my colleague reference the fact that he would be splitting his time, and second, heard that the member was recognized by the Chair. I have been here nearly 15 years. I have been in the position as parliamentary secretary to the government House leader for nine of those years. I am very familiar with procedural matters. In fact, on this very question in procedures and practices, I have seen it employed and I have employed it myself on several occasions in the last 15 years.

In other words, I believe I know what I am doing from a procedural standpoint. I would not have stood in my place and made a point of order had I not heard you recognize my colleague from Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan. The only reason I stood on a point of order is because my other colleague from Mégantic—L'Érable started speaking and I heard him start speaking before my colleague from Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan.

Mr. Speaker, I would ask you to please consult with the audiotapes and the visual tapes and I think you will find that those two tapes support my intervention.

Topic:   Routine Proceedings
Subtopic:   Committees of the House
Full View Permalink

October 31, 2018

Mr. Tom Lukiwski

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. As you can see, I am positioned very close to both members in question. I distinctly heard the member for Mégantic—L'Érable start speaking before the member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan. Mr. Speaker, I think you know what happens in a situation like this, so without going into further detail, I would certainly say right now that I move on this point of order, seconded by my colleague, the member for Perth—Wellington that the member for Mégantic—L'Érable be now heard.

Topic:   Routine Proceedings
Subtopic:   Committees of the House
Full View Permalink

October 16, 2018

Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, CPC)

Mr. Speaker, earlier today during statements by members, the member for Regina—Lewvan stood and was quite clearly displaying a delegate's badge from the most recent Saskatchewan NDP convention.

While I understand that there has traditionally been a prohibition on the use of props in the House, I also understand that on many occasions members, including me, have come in here wearing badges or buttons or ribbons signifying support for a particular charitable organization. I also understand that normally the Speaker rules on such matters, determining whether or not the badge or the prop in question caused disorder in the House.

In this particular case, I did not see any disorder in the House, although I suspect the member might have caused some disorder within the NDP caucus.

My question is whether you, Mr. Speaker, could clarify for all members of the House what you consider, in your opinion, an agreeable or approachable or appropriate badge or prop to be used by members during their statements?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Points of Order
Full View Permalink

October 15, 2018

Mr. Tom Lukiwski

Madam Speaker, I want to point out a couple of things to my colleague.

First, with respect to the trade agreements he referenced, CETA was negotiated by our former Conservative government. TPP negotiations were initiated by our former government. I would also go further and point out to my colleague that under CETA, as one particular example, any trade agreement we signed benefits Canada as well as the European Union. That is certainly not the case with the USMCA.

Let us talk about one particular sector with respect to CETA: supply management. We allowed the European Union to gain access to the Canadian dairy market, primarily in Quebec, in the range of 2.5% to 3%. However, two things also accompanied that concession. We compensated our dairy producers to the tune of $4.3 billion, and most importantly, the reciprocal agreement provided that our dairy farmers had access to 18 countries in the European Union.

Contrast that with the recently signed USMCA, by which the United States gained access to the Canadian dairy market in Quebec while Canada got no access whatsoever to its market. That is not fair trade. That is not equal trade. That is capitulation. That is a concession outright.

That is why we continue to point out to Canadians that the USMCA, while a relief to most Canadians that an agreement was reached, is a bad deal, and that bad deal falls on the shoulders of the Liberal government.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Multilateral Instrument in Respect of Tax Conventions Act
Full View Permalink