Napoléon Antoine BELCOURT

BELCOURT, The Hon. Napoléon Antoine, P.C., K.C., LL.M., LL.D.

Personal Data

Party
Liberal
Constituency
Ottawa (City of) (Ontario)
Birth Date
September 15, 1860
Deceased Date
August 7, 1932
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoléon_Belcourt
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=f908fda1-bf0c-4590-a547-3edf669acb55&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
lawyer

Parliamentary Career

June 23, 1896 - October 9, 1900
LIB
  Ottawa (City of) (Ontario)
November 7, 1900 - September 29, 1904
LIB
  Ottawa (City of) (Ontario)
  • Speaker of the House of Commons (March 10, 1904 - January 10, 1905)
November 3, 1904 - September 17, 1908
LIB
  Ottawa (City of) (Ontario)
  • Speaker of the House of Commons (March 10, 1904 - January 10, 1905)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 5 of 104)


June 7, 1905

Mr. BELCOURT.

I understood the hon. leader of the opposition to say distinctly yesterday afternoon that the government had refused to instruct the commissioners to inquire into the question of fraud and misrepresentation in the obtaining of the concessions. I called my hon. friend's attention to the fact that the return brought down and printed and distributed among the members of this House for some time, showed clearly that the instruction's contained in paragraph 10 were distinct and e'ear instructions to the commissioners to investigate questions of fraud and misrepresentation, and I pointed out to my hon. friend, that the judge, in various parts of his report, had referred to those instructions, and had stated distinctly when the commission opened, that he was empowered to investigate questions of fraud and misrepresentation. I pointed out also that he had heard evidence in several cases tending to prove or to disprove that there had been fraud and misrepresentation. I pointed out that in every oue of the cases referred to him in which charges were made, the judge reported that no fraud or misrepresentation had been proved. So I think the hon. gentleman owes it to the House to say that he was mistaken when he said that it is hot fair on his part to say that there were no such instructions.

Topic:   THE TREADGOLD CONCESSION INQUIRY.
Full View Permalink

June 7, 1905

Mr. BELOOURT.

What I saiil was that if there were a thousand Catholics as against five hundred Protestants and two thousand Mormons the Catholics, as a matter of right, under section 11 of the Act of 1875. would hare the right to establish schools as they might think fit, and the tire hundred Protestants in the minority would be entitled to separate schools of their own. As regards the Jews and Mormons and others, they would have to go either to the Protestant or Catholic schools.

Topic:   JT7NE 8. 1905
Full View Permalink

June 7, 1905

Mr. BELCOURT.

That was not my hon. friend's statement.

Topic:   THE TREADGOLD CONCESSION INQUIRY.
Full View Permalink

June 7, 1905

Mr. BELCOURT.

I say that the return-

Mr R, L. BORDEN. I am not talking about the return but about the instruction.

Topic:   THE TREADGOLD CONCESSION INQUIRY.
Full View Permalink

June 7, 1905

Mr. BELCOURT.

I say that these were not the instructions of the government. The instructions were distinctly and clearly to investigate all questions of fraud and misrepresentation and I have proved that.

Topic:   THE TREADGOLD CONCESSION INQUIRY.
Full View Permalink