Charles Bernhard HEYD

HEYD, Charles Bernhard

Personal Data

Party
Liberal
Constituency
Brant South (Ontario)
Birth Date
February 23, 1842
Deceased Date
September 16, 1929
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Bernhard_Heyd
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=ede11a44-bdbe-4b6e-8dbf-0d27f94556e9&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
grocer

Parliamentary Career

February 4, 1897 - October 9, 1900
LIB
  Brant South (Ontario)
November 7, 1900 - September 29, 1904
LIB
  Brant South (Ontario)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 105 of 105)


February 27, 1901

Mr. C. B. HEYD (South Brant).

Mr. ' Speaker, it would be hardly expected that I should remain quiet while a subject of so much magnitude was being discussed in this House. Representing, as I do, a constituency in which there are two binder twine factories, you would naturally suppose that I should know something about the subject of binder twine.

Topic:   QUESTIONS.
Subtopic:   COMMOXS
Full View Permalink

February 19, 1901

Mr. HEYD.

How much liability should we have to assume ?

Topic:   SUPPLY-THE RAILWAY QUESTION.
Full View Permalink

February 19, 1901

Mr. C. B. HEYD (South Brant).

I listened, Mr. Speaker, with a great deal of interest to the remarks with which my hon friend from East York (Mr. Maclean) introduced his resolution, and I thought he was doing bravely until he read the terms of the resolution itself. I am one of those who believe that tl*e time has come when the people should get a certain portion back or

that which belongs to them, and that it is time we should call a halt in the rolling up of these immense fortunes by a few individuals. The number of people who believe that much of the wealth which should go into the hands of the people generally is being diverted by corporations, and particularly by large railway corporations, is increasing largely, and I listened with favour to the remarks of my hon. friend, and would support to the best of my ability any scheme calculated to lessen the burdens that rest upon the producers in this country, and give a larger share of the benefits to the great mass of wage-earners. But the resolution is entirely different from the language in which it was introduced. The question of state ownership does not present itself at all in the resolution, nor do we find in it any condemnation of monopolies. The only thing we find in the resolution is this, that the hon. gentleman took advantage of a sentiment that is strongly growing in this country in order to disseminate the idea that the present government is not successfully carrying on the affairs of the Intercolonial Railway, and that we could only hope for successful management by vesting one-half of it in the hands of Conservatives. That is all there is in the resolution. It does not call on us to approve of government ownership, but simply to condemn the present management of the Intercolonial Railway by the Hon. Mr. Blair, and to declare that everything would be bright and rosy if he would only associate with himself some good red hot Tory. I am not prepared to support that resolution, because there is not the remotest connection between it and the speech with which my hon. friend introduced it. I am with him when he declares himself in favour of bettering the condition of the mass of the people. I am with him when he expresses his desire to prevent millionaires from rolling up fortunes and going to distant lands and seeking honours in distant lands by becoming Sirs and Lords and Dukes ; but I am not prepared to condemn the present management of the Intercolonial Railway. I do not want, nor do the people want, hon. gentlemen opposite, for years to come, to have any share in its management.

Topic:   SUPPLY-THE RAILWAY QUESTION.
Full View Permalink

February 19, 1901

Mr. HEYD.

Is that all there is in the resolution ?

Topic:   SUPPLY-THE RAILWAY QUESTION.
Full View Permalink