Harry Oliver WHITE

WHITE, Harry Oliver

Personal Data

Party
Progressive Conservative
Constituency
Middlesex East (Ontario)
Birth Date
January 6, 1895
Deceased Date
September 4, 1987
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Oliver_White
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=ed7c9721-7803-4bd8-a892-696cdd38f5a0&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
farmer

Parliamentary Career

June 11, 1945 - April 30, 1949
PC
  Middlesex East (Ontario)
June 27, 1949 - June 13, 1953
PC
  Middlesex East (Ontario)
August 10, 1953 - April 12, 1957
PC
  Middlesex East (Ontario)
June 10, 1957 - February 1, 1958
PC
  Middlesex East (Ontario)
March 31, 1958 - April 19, 1962
PC
  Middlesex East (Ontario)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 153 of 156)


July 3, 1946

1. Have any farms been purchased in East Middlesex under the Veterans Land Act?

2. If so, in what townships, concessions, and what are the lot numbers?

3. What price was paid for each?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   VETERANS LAND ACT-MIDDLESEX COUNTY
Full View Permalink

June 17, 1946

1. How many bushels of soy beans have been imported into Canada during each of the years 1940 to 1945 inclusive?

2. By what companies have they been imported?

3. What price have these companies paid for soy beans each year?

4. What subsidy per bushel has been paid in each year?

5. What was the ceiling price on Canadian-grown soy beans in each of the years 1940 to 1945?

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS
Subtopic:   SOY BEANS
Full View Permalink

May 29, 1946

Mr. WHITE (Middlesex East):

Last evening we were discussing item 28, dealing with products with which I am somewhat familiar. The minister said that last year the production of honey was 30,683,000 pounds. That would go a long way to helping to meet the sugar shortage. While the low average yield last year decreased the production somewhat, we still have a .production in the dominion of some thirty million pounds of honey. We have in the dominion a national honey council which is supported by the primary producers of honey, and it is a credit to the industry that they have not asked for government aid. They are securing funds by a levy of a small fraction of a cent per pound on the production of each individual. The position of this industry, in comparison with other branches of agriculture, is favourable, because of the fact

that while dairy products and many other commodities are supported by subsidies, this does not apply to honey. Therefore we do not look to the future with the misgiving that many farmers have as they see the day approaching when subsidies may be removed. We can see the position the milk producers were in when the subsidy was removed; immediately the consumers in the city were demanding that it be replaced. We are in a relatively favourable position because of that fact. We are in need of better domestic grading, but we do not wish the regulations to work to the advantage of central packers and to the detriment of the primary producer.

Many products which the farmers sell are graded, but after they leave the farmers' hands they lose their identity, because the grade is not carried on to the ultimate consumer. This applies particularly to pork. There are several grades when the farmer sells it, but it is all number one when the consumer buys it. The honey producers are keenly interested in having the control of the industry remain with the producers. We do not want it to get into the hands of any government agency or any selling agency of the government. The producers feel that they can manage their own affairs if given proper opportunities. We are in a peculiar position at the moment. The beekeepers of the country are prepared to sell their honey on the export market in Britain. For many years we exported our product to Britain, and we have letters showing that the buyers there are willing to buy our product, but the regulations on that side were such that they could not buy or could pay only so much. I am personally willing, and so are many others, to sell to buyers in the old country, but the control regulations here have in the past prevented us from doing so. Two governments, therefore, interfere in the business. Britain at the moment is offering only 65 shillings per hundredweight Lo.b. British ports. That, boiled down, comes to about 12% cents, and taking shipping charges off it does not come up to the domestic price at the moment. However, we believe that the day is coming when we shall again export honey to England. The industry wants domestic grading so that consumers can purchase by grade and know what they are buying. We have grading regulations for export and interprovincially, but that does not apply within the individual province. We do not want to have the industry controlled by government authorities who are anxious and willing to tell us what w-e should do and how to do it. We ask to have the industry left as independent as possible of government control.

Supply-Agriculture

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS
Full View Permalink

May 28, 1946

Mr. WHITE (Middlesex East):

At the beginnning of the discussion on the agricultural estimates the minister said that the Canadian seed growers would be given a grant of $25,000. While the grant this year is increased by $6,100 over the grant of last year, it really is not an increase. This year there was a deficit of $6,100, and the Canadian seed growers asked the government to make this up. This is a rather small grant which pays large dividends and I am wondering if it could not be increased.

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Full View Permalink

May 9, 1946

Mr. WHITE (Middlesex East):

It is in Hansard. Read it over again.

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Full View Permalink