William THOBURN

THOBURN, William

Personal Data

Party
Conservative (1867-1942)
Constituency
Lanark North (Ontario)
Birth Date
April 14, 1847
Deceased Date
January 23, 1928
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thoburn_(politician)
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=e6ff10cd-b633-4ffa-baba-3be20ae91f85&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
woollens manufacturer

Parliamentary Career

October 26, 1908 - July 29, 1911
CON
  Lanark North (Ontario)
September 21, 1911 - October 6, 1917
CON
  Lanark North (Ontario)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 2 of 26)


September 17, 1917

Mr. THOBURN:

Dressmaking? A woman going to a house with another man in the

middle of the night under the guise of going to a dressmaking establishment? I am astonished at a man of the standing of the hon. member for North Perth trying to make hon. members, .swallow such gush as that.

Topic:   GORDON DIVORCE BILL NOT REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE.
Full View Permalink

September 14, 1917

Mr. THOBURN:

I was paired with the hon. member for Sherbrooke (Mr. McCrea). Otherwise I would have voted for the motion.

Topic:   WAR-TIME ELECTIONS ACT.
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR APPLICATION OF RULE 17B ON THIRD READING OF BILL CARRIED.
Full View Permalink

September 10, 1917

Mr. THOBURN:

I was paired with the hon. member for Sherbrooke (Mr. McCrea). Had I voted, I would have voted for the motion.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Sir George Foster (Minister of Trade and Commerce) for the second reading of Bill 133, The War-Time Elections Act.

Topic:   WAR TIME ELECTIONS ACT.
Subtopic:   MOTION FOE APPLICATION OF HULE 17B ON SECOND READING OF BILL
Full View Permalink

September 7, 1917

Mr. THOBURN:

Under the circumstances could not the matter stand without its being referred back to the committee?

Topic:   W98 COMMONS
Full View Permalink

September 7, 1917

Mr. WILLIAM THOBURN (North Lanark) :

For the information of the member for South Renfrew (Mr. Graham), I may say that the reason given by the Senate Committee for not having the evidence published-it is, perhaps, the first time in the history of that committee that the evidence in a case of this kind has not been published-was that they thought that the evidence was of such a nature that it should not be sent broadcast over this Dominion. The evidence is now being printed, and it is expected that it will be in the boxes of all members of the House to-morrow morning.

Topic:   W98 COMMONS
Full View Permalink