Leon David CRESTOHL

CRESTOHL, Leon David, Q.C., B.C.L.

Personal Data

Party
Liberal
Constituency
Cartier (Quebec)
Birth Date
May 7, 1900
Deceased Date
March 21, 1963
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Crestohl
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=e1563762-d628-4f12-ad58-fc20c4b62221&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
lawyer

Parliamentary Career

June 19, 1950 - June 13, 1953
LIB
  Cartier (Quebec)
August 10, 1953 - April 12, 1957
LIB
  Cartier (Quebec)
June 10, 1957 - February 1, 1958
LIB
  Cartier (Quebec)
March 31, 1958 - April 19, 1962
LIB
  Cartier (Quebec)
June 18, 1962 - February 6, 1963
LIB
  Cartier (Quebec)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 204)


February 4, 1963

Mr. Cresiohl:

How very gallant.

Topic:   ALLEGED LACK OF LEADERSHIP, CONFUSION AND INDECISION
Full View Permalink

February 4, 1963

Mr. Creslohl:

Six billion dollars.

Topic:   ALLEGED LACK OF LEADERSHIP, CONFUSION AND INDECISION
Full View Permalink

February 4, 1963

Mr. Crestohl:

You will become a responsible opposition.

Topic:   ALLEGED LACK OF LEADERSHIP, CONFUSION AND INDECISION
Full View Permalink

January 29, 1963

Mr. Crestohl:

May I ask the hon. member who has just resumed his seat a question? Can he inform the committee whether any progress has been made by the representatives of the four parties who are attempting to reach some satisfactory decision about this matter?

Topic:   SONJA BAGRY
Full View Permalink

January 22, 1963

Mr. Creslohl:

Mr. Chairman, on a point of order, perhaps to enlighten the hon. member, notwithstanding his agitation about the document which he read to the committee, unfortunately the committee cannot consider it. That is a premarital contract. Whether the hon. member likes it or not, this is a premarital contract passed before the proper authorities in the province of Quebec and the house cannot pronounce itself one way or another in any manner which could affect that contract. It is a contract which deals purely with rights and properties within the province and for this reason I submit the hon. member is entirely out of order. If the hon. member has no other matter to raise, I suggest this should be pointed out to him, since the house has no jurisdiction whatsoever over this aspect of the question. I do not wish to pronounce myself as to the conclusions he is drawing. They may be proper or improper. The point is that if we consider them we would be dealing with a matter which is entirely within the jurisdiction of a province and, therefore, this committee should not pronounce on it in any way.

Topic:   MILDRED DAWSON MEAKINS
Full View Permalink