Walter Frederick KUHL

KUHL, Walter Frederick

Personal Data

Party
Social Credit
Constituency
Jasper--Edson (Alberta)
Birth Date
June 25, 1905
Deceased Date
January 11, 1991
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Frederick_Kuhl
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=89fd07b7-fffb-4fe0-af27-59f1d5a94e62&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
teacher

Parliamentary Career

October 14, 1935 - January 25, 1940
SC
  Jasper--Edson (Alberta)
March 26, 1940 - April 16, 1945
ND
  Jasper--Edson (Alberta)
June 11, 1945 - April 30, 1949
SC
  Jasper--Edson (Alberta)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 5 of 82)


March 22, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

I think the hon. gentleman knows it just as well as any of us who have made any remarks on the subject.

Topic:   WAYS AND MEANS
Subtopic:   EXCISE TAX ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink

March 22, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

I am not supporting them.

Topic:   WAYS AND MEANS
Subtopic:   EXCISE TAX ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink

March 22, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

This afternoon when the hon. member for Temiscouata was criticizing the government for the policy involved in this particular measure, he made some reference to consistency and logic with particular reference to myself. I rather resented1 his remarks with respect to me, because I have always prided myself on being consistent and logical in what I say. If the hon. gentleman has any criticism to make of anything I have said in the past on economics or on the British North America Act, I suggest that he take the text of my remarks and indicate in what respect I have been inconsistent and illogical. I believe that the shoe is on the other foot. I think the hon. gentleman is the one who is illogical and inconsistent. On the one hand, he criticizes his party and the government for taxation policy and, on the other hand he does not suggest any alternative. Yet he has the audacity and the effrontery to ridicule and scoff at suggestions which emanate from this group. Furthermore, he indicates his inconsistency most definitely by voting opposite to the way in which he talks, when it comes to a vote. So, when it comes to a matter of consistency, I suggest that the hon. gentleman resort to a little introspection.

I think the only members of this house who have spoken logically on the principle involved in this particular bill and similar bills are the members of the Social Credit group. We have heard much criticism on the part of certain hon. gentlemen in the Liberal party; we have also heard a great deal of it from the Conservatives and from the C.C.F. But if they were in the seats of the mighty, what policy would they pursue? What would be their source of funds? What would be their method of attempting to achieve the results which the government alleges it is attempting to achieve? With regard to the Conservative party, I cannot imagine their using any different policies whatsoever from those which the government is using. They have not indicated that they have any other policy. If they are to reduce taxation in some respects, they must raise money by other means. Thus far they have not subscribed to the Social Credit way of doing it, and they have not any of their own. So I think they are certainly guilty of inconsistency as well.

I think the same reasoning can be applied to our C.C.F. friends. They moved an amendment this afternoon in an attempt to abolish at least one section of this measure, in order to reduce taxes which are being levied or which might be levied. But on the other hand, if they were in office and were managing the government, what would they use as a source of funds? How would they derive their revenue? So far as I am able to observe from listening to their statements, they would resort to taxation. They have not suggested any alternative. So whether, under their administration, they raise the money through this particular means or not, they would still have to resort to taxation. In advocating the policies which they have advocated, I cannot see how they can consider themselves to be consistent.

Therefore that leaves only the members of the Social Credit group who, in my opinion, have spoken consistently on this. All through the years we have advocated drastic reductions of taxation, even to the point of total elimination of dominion taxation. But we have not left it there. We have indicated an alternative for the raising of money.

Topic:   WAYS AND MEANS
Subtopic:   EXCISE TAX ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink

March 22, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

The government is responsible.

Topic:   WAYS AND MEANS
Subtopic:   EXCISE TAX ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink

March 17, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

They are all opposed to private enterprise.

Topic:   COMMUNIST AGENTS
Subtopic:   ACTIVITIES IN CANADA-MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 31
Full View Permalink