Walter Frederick KUHL

KUHL, Walter Frederick

Personal Data

Party
Social Credit
Constituency
Jasper--Edson (Alberta)
Birth Date
June 25, 1905
Deceased Date
January 11, 1991
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Frederick_Kuhl
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=89fd07b7-fffb-4fe0-af27-59f1d5a94e62&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
teacher

Parliamentary Career

October 14, 1935 - January 25, 1940
SC
  Jasper--Edson (Alberta)
March 26, 1940 - April 16, 1945
ND
  Jasper--Edson (Alberta)
June 11, 1945 - April 30, 1949
SC
  Jasper--Edson (Alberta)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 4 of 82)


May 21, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

What about private business?

Topic:   THE BUDGET
Subtopic:   ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE MINISTER OF FINANCE
Full View Permalink

April 6, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

Just the gold.

Topic:   GOLD MINING
Subtopic:   EMERGENCY PAYMENTS TO ASSIST IN MEETING INCREASED COST OF PRODUCTION
Full View Permalink

April 6, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

Whose proposal was that?

Topic:   GOLD MINING
Subtopic:   EMERGENCY PAYMENTS TO ASSIST IN MEETING INCREASED COST OF PRODUCTION
Full View Permalink

March 22, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

All right, Mr. Chairman. I do not intend to launch into a discussion of money theories. I was just answering a question which the hon. gentleman put to me. But I repeat that I and my associates in the Social Credit group are definitely opposed to this measure. We stand for a drastic reduction of taxation, and we have indicated an alternative.

There is one aspect of the present situation which I think has not received the attention it should have received, namely, the positive side rather than the negative. The minister, his supporters and others have suggested that the objective of this measure is to curtail consumption. Why place so much emphasis on the curtailing of consumption? Why not look at it positively and consider whether we cannot do something more about stimulating production? That is an aspect which, according to my observation, has not received much emphasis during the course of this debate. I feel certain that one means of stimulating much production in this country is to reduce taxation. I am sure that every hon. member has heard farmers, workers and businessmen in general say that they would be glad to produce a little more but for taxation. What do we invariably hear? The farmer says, "Why should I raise my production when, as a consequence, I do nothing but pay more taxes?" The worker says the same thing, namely, "Why should I work overtime, bring my income up into the next bracket and penalize myself by so doing?" All the way through the whole economy we find that, as a result of taxation, there is a certain amount of discouragement of production.

Therefore I suggest that we place a little more emphasis on the positive side of our program and see whether we cannot do something by way of stimulating production, and thus provide ourselves with more goods with which to take care of the needs abroad and of ourselves. I think the best way to do that would be to remove those elements of our economic life which discourage production, one of which, in my opinion, is taxation. So I suggest that the policy involved in this resolution can do nothing but discourage still further the production of very much needed goods in this country. Therefore I, together with my

associates, will oppose it; and I personally think the whole thing should be consigned to the nether regions.

Topic:   WAYS AND MEANS
Subtopic:   EXCISE TAX ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink

March 22, 1948

Mr. KUHL:

I think the hon. gentleman knows it just as well as any of us who have made any remarks on the subject.

Topic:   WAYS AND MEANS
Subtopic:   EXCISE TAX ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink