T.A. Bud BRADLEY

BRADLEY, T.A. Bud, C.D., D.D.S.

Personal Data

Party
Progressive Conservative
Constituency
Haldimand--Norfolk (Ontario)
Birth Date
April 30, 1938
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bud_Bradley
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=82a7280e-c033-4d44-9582-d2d19a1d1af9&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
dentist

Parliamentary Career

May 22, 1979 - December 14, 1979
PC
  Haldimand--Norfolk (Ontario)
February 18, 1980 - July 9, 1984
PC
  Haldimand--Norfolk (Ontario)
September 4, 1984 - October 1, 1988
PC
  Haldimand--Norfolk (Ontario)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Supply and Services (November 1, 1984 - October 14, 1986)
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence (October 15, 1986 - November 20, 1988)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 60)


August 16, 1988

Mr. Bud Bradley (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of National Defence):

Mr. Speaker, the Hon. Member raises a very serious question, as he is well aware. I would be interested to know if the Hon. Member is now showing that he no longer supports such a move by the Government of Canada to modernize Canada's Armed Forces.

I think the Hon. Member will find that it is Canada's intent to modernize its navy and to provide its navy with the best technical equipment available. I think he will also be aware that the Minister of National Defence stated very recently that the announcement would be made soon.

Topic:   ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
Subtopic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Full View Permalink

August 16, 1988

Mr. Bud Bradley (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of National Defence):

Mr. Speaker, I would be very pleased to tell the Hon. Member where I stand. I stand with this Government in supporting Canada's Armed Forces and in replacing their ill-equipped vessels which were given to them and not replaced by previous Governments. We will provide the navy with the required weapons systems.

I notice that the Hon. Member says that he supports but his Party does not. I wonder if he supports a submarine program or if he is talking through his hat.

Topic:   ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
Subtopic:   GOVERNMENT POSITION
Full View Permalink

July 8, 1988

Mr. Bud Bradley (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of National Defence):

(a) and (c) The submarine project will follow Environment Canada's Federal Environmental Assessment and Review Process (EARP) with respect to environmental impact assessments. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited will be contracted to commence the initial environmental screening in mid-1988. Consultations will take place with military base experts, members of the civilian environmental, scientific and technical communities, and local elected officials.

(b) The total costs are yet to be determined, but are expected to fall in the range $300,000 to $400,000.

Topic:   PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Full View Permalink

July 8, 1988

Mr. Bud Bradley (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of National Defence):

Department of National Defence's

submarine project cost estimates include all items, with the exception of (e) (ii). An appropriate allowance for cost risk is also included in the estimates for each item. The estimates will differ somewhat depending on whether they apply to the French or the British submarine design. The estimates will be refined during project definition so as to support a subsequent government decision on whether or not to proceed with project implementation. The actual cost estimates cannot be divulged at this time so as to protect British and French proprietary information and not to prejudice the selection of submarine design country of origin.

Topic:   PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Full View Permalink

June 17, 1988

Mr. Bud Bradley (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of National Defence):

Canadian Defence Ministers have held discussions with their NATO counterparts since 1984 as part of the defence policy review. The outcome of such discussions was reflected in the Defence White Paper. You will appreciate that national security considerations and the confidentiality of ministerial discussions preclude the provision of details of discussions with foreign governments.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Full View Permalink