Richard Clive COOPER

COOPER, Lt. Col. Richard Clive

Personal Data

Party
Unionist
Constituency
Vancouver South (British Columbia)
Birth Date
December 31, 1881
Deceased Date
March 10, 1940
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Clive_Cooper
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=3eb5c3bf-5293-4167-a8dc-79527bb53cca&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
accountant

Parliamentary Career

December 17, 1917 - October 4, 1921
UNION
  Vancouver South (British Columbia)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 6 of 10)


June 23, 1919

Mr. COOPER:

Under this Bill, a man that owns his farm, but has an encumbrance against it of more than $2,500, cannot take advantage of this legislation. Would it not be possible for the minister to reconsider that provision?

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS.
Subtopic:   SOLDIERS SETTLEMENT ON THE LAND.
Full View Permalink

June 23, 1919

Mr. COOPER:

The hon. minister has emphasized that this is a national undertaking and not especially for returned soldiers. Would he define what soldiers are entitled to the benefits of this Bill? There are a large number of men who proceeded as far as Bermuda. Are they to be considered overseas men? A large number proceeded to Siberia, which cannot be defined as the theatre of war. There seems to me to be a great discrimination against many good men who have served in Canada-men who have been retained in Canada for no other reason than their own efficiency. The greater benefits of this Bill, as of other legislation pertaining to soldiers, will go to the class of soldiers that deserve least of

their country. I refer in particular to those men who were forced to do their duty by the Military Service Act. Some 4,000 of these men have served in Siberia; some

20,000 or 30,000 of them have not gone any farther than England. Many thousands of men volunteered in Canada and gave excellent service, but, through no fault of their own, they were prevented from going overseas. If this is to be a national undertaking, I say that these men are entitled to consideration. Furthermore, I notice that section 2, paragraph 3, provides that the widow of any person who died on active service, and who but for his death might be a settler as now defined, etc-. Now, does that not preclude the widow of a soldier who died on duty in Canada from benefiting?

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS.
Subtopic:   SOLDIERS SETTLEMENT ON THE LAND.
Full View Permalink

June 23, 1919

Mr. COOPER:

I understand it will not be possible under this clause for a soldier who already owns a homestead to take up land under this scheme. Is that so?

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS.
Subtopic:   SOLDIERS SETTLEMENT ON THE LAND.
Full View Permalink

June 21, 1919

Mr. COOPER:

The Oriental at the present time has no vote. Under this section he would be allowed to vote.

Topic:   BRITISH NATIONALITY, NATURALIZATION AND ALIENS CONSOLIDATION AC'T.
Full View Permalink

June 21, 1919

Mr. COOPER:

If an Oriental in the past has had a right to vote in federal elections that right has never been exercised and British Columbia would not desire that it should be exercised.

Topic:   BRITISH NATIONALITY, NATURALIZATION AND ALIENS CONSOLIDATION AC'T.
Full View Permalink