James Lorimer ILSLEY

ILSLEY, The Hon. James Lorimer, P.C., K.C., B.A., LL.B., D.C.L., LL.D.
Personal Data
- Party
- Liberal
- Constituency
- Digby--Annapolis--Kings (Nova Scotia)
- Birth Date
- January 3, 1894
- Deceased Date
- January 14, 1967
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lorimer_Ilsley
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=396d7d47-d79c-4aea-bf33-18c3e7b199e3&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- barrister
Parliamentary Career
- September 14, 1926 - May 30, 1930
- LIBHants--Kings (Nova Scotia)
- July 28, 1930 - August 14, 1935
- LIBHants--Kings (Nova Scotia)
- October 14, 1935 - January 25, 1940
- LIBDigby--Annapolis--Kings (Nova Scotia)
- Minister of National Revenue (October 23, 1935 - July 7, 1940)
- March 26, 1940 - April 16, 1945
- LIBDigby--Annapolis--Kings (Nova Scotia)
- Minister of National Revenue (October 23, 1935 - July 7, 1940)
- Postmaster General (May 23, 1940 - July 7, 1940)
- Minister of Finance and Receiver General (July 8, 1940 - December 9, 1946)
- June 11, 1945 - April 30, 1949
- LIBDigby--Annapolis--Kings (Nova Scotia)
- Minister of Finance and Receiver General (July 8, 1940 - December 9, 1946)
- Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada (December 10, 1946 - June 30, 1948)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 3506)
December 18, 1957
Mr. Ilsley:
Does not my hon. friend agree that at the present time the construction of houses is in no way limited by financial considerations? Does he not agree that it is limited purely by physical considerations?
December 18, 1957
Mr. Ilsley:
They are not limiting the construction of houses at this time at all. The limitation at the present time is physical, and is found in the present capacity of the country to produce materials.
Mr. Speaker, I have just quoted at length what was said on that occasion to illustrate that in 1945 it was suggested we could not build houses because we were short of materials. In 1957 we are told we cannot build houses because we are short of money, though we have an abundance of materials. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I suggest that by using in housing the methods we used during the war and mobilizing our credit behind the full resources of this country we could provide the lower income groups in Canada with all the houses they require on a very sound basis.
I just forgot this, Mr. Speaker: I had intended before sitting down* to bring to the attention of the minister the fact that there are certain people who are trying to do their best in present circumstances. Does the minister realize that there are small lumber operators in the interior of British Columbia who are working on a very small margin of profit and have been doing so for the whole of this year, although in a good number of cases these are efficient and well operated 96698-1621
National Housing Act
mills. Some of them, indeed, have been running at a considerable loss. At the same time there are employees in the lumber industries in the interior of British Columbia who have voted not to accept a 6 per cent increase in wages to which they were entitled under a two-year contract, in order to help keep the lumber industry going. These people have been shipping lumber to the prairies, particularly No. 1 common fir, in log lumber, two by four, two by six, two by eight and two by ten, shiplaps, sidings, boarding materials generally, at prices f.o.b. southern interior of British Columbia points-I can see the parliamentary assistant pricking his ears up as he hears me speak of this-ranging from $57.50 to $62 a thousand. I think the parliamentary assistant should be asked to find out what the lumber yards are charging to persons who wish to build homes with this same lumber after making allowance for the cost of transportation and so on.
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I suggest that now is the time for an examination to be made of all aspects of this problem-the need for providing an adequate fund, sound methods of financing the cost of materials, the type of materials and the services to be provided. The average man earning a low income cannot afford to pay more than $6,000 for a home. I say that from my personal experience. I think a great deal more could be done to provide the type of house necessary to a person in the low income group. Could not some further study be undertaken, particularly with respect to the possibility of the owner-building of homes and the possibility of using more of the procedures and methods which have been used so successfully under the small holding section of the Veterans Land Act.
February 17, 1953
Hon. J. L. Ilsley (Minister of Finance) moved
that the house go into committee to consider the following resolution:
Resolved, that it is expedient to introduce a measure to provide:
Then there are four paragraphs. The Speaker was in the chair and Mr. Ilsley, the minister of finance in Mr. Mackenzie King's government, stood up and said:
Mr. Speaker, I propose to make a statement to the house on this resolution while Your Honour is in the chair.
Seventeen days after Mr. Speaker Glen had ruled that the debate on that occasion should be directed to the negative-and you can bet your boots that Mr. Ilsley did not speak to the negative of his resolution-he spoke to the affirmative with great vigour and at considerable length.
Subtopic: PROVISION TO EXTEND OPERATION FOR A FURTHER PERIOD, ETC.
April 10, 1951
Mr. Ilsley:
. . . the hon. member for Winnipeg
North Centre (Mr Knowles) put a question and pressed me to answer it, and I will do this as best I can, although it is almost impossible to give an answer to the question He asked for an estimate of the benefits to the citizens of Canada as a result of the price control policies; that is to say, the saving in prices to the consumer-the amount by which consumer prices were made lower than they otherwise would have been.
The following estimate gives some indication of the strain and difficulty which would have developed in the Canadian economy without price control. It is based on the assumption that in the absence of price control prices would have risen in recent years to the same extent that they rose in world war I and its aftermath. Nobody knows whether they would or would not, or would have risen higher.
Subtopic: AMENDMENT, MR. DREW
April 10, 1951
Mr. Ilsley:
I said nearly $8 billion a year between
1942 and 1946, to buy goods and services, which in fact cost them on the average not quite $6-5 billion a year. If hon. gentlemen want to know how that is arrived at they can procure table 11, gross national expenditure at market prices, 1938 to 1946, issued by the bureau of statistics, which shows the personal expenditure on consumer goods and services for each of the years from 1938 to 1946; and if the amount spent had increased proportionately to the increase in prices in the first great war, the amount spent would have averaged $8 billion in those years instead of the $6J billion which the consumers actually did spend.
Subtopic: AMENDMENT, MR. DREW