James (Jim) Gordon LIND

LIND, James (Jim) Gordon, B.A.

Personal Data

Middlesex (Ontario)
Birth Date
March 8, 1913
Deceased Date
April 22, 1980
lumber merchant

Parliamentary Career

November 8, 1965 - April 23, 1968
  Middlesex East (Ontario)
June 25, 1968 - September 1, 1972
  Middlesex (Ontario)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 22)

April 19, 1972

Mr. Lind:

Is it true that some of the large manufacturers of plywood have to negotiate with the CNR to supply their own boxcars in order to move their product to the eastern provinces?

Full View Permalink

April 19, 1972

Mr. J. G. Lind (Middlesex):

Mr. Speaker, we are sure that the two great national railway systems, Canadian National and Canadian Pacific, are doing their best to move all the grain from the west, but my concern and question are directed to the Minister of Transport. What is the minister going to do about the boxcar situation to move lumber from British Columbia to Ontario where it is greatly needed for housing construction?

Full View Permalink

December 29, 1971

Mr. J. G. Lind (Middlesex):

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure and a privilege to speak on Bill C-176, the national farm products marketing bill. As one who is an active farmer in the constituency of Middlesex, I say at the outset that I have enjoyed the privileges extended under three of the Ontario farm marketing boards. We all recognize that farmers as a general rule are rather independent people who rely on their own resources and initiative to make a "go" of farming. We realize that in the very competitive society in which we live some farmers need legislation to protect them. The well-to-do, prosperous farmers may not

December 29, 1971

Farm Products Marketing Agencies Bill

need this legislation. The gentleman farmer, the rancher, or the individual who is well established does not need any protection, but I assert that the young farmer, the one who is taking on the burden of debt in order to establish himself as a primary producer of agricultural products, needs some protection in the marketplace.

In my area of Middlesex and in southern Ontario we have 18 different marketing boards, four of which work under the quota system. I am referring to the Ontario Marketing Board, the Flue-cured Tobacco Marketing Board, and the broiler and turkey boards. This quota system, especially under the Ontario Marketing Board and the Flue-cured Tobacco Marketing Board has been advantageous to participating farmers. I think it has been good for industries such as the dairy industry and the tobacco industry to have these marketing boards. Because of their success, because they have been able to control production, they have enjoyed in the marketplace a fair return for their efforts. Therefore they have expanded, have been able to maintain a good level of economic prosperity in the community and have been successful in the eyes of their neighbours.

Within my riding of Middlesex is the riding of the Minister of Agriculture and Food of the province of Ontario. I should like to quote some of his remarks regarding the urgency of this legislation. I maintain that we need some national farm products marketing legislation. He said on January 25:

How soon can we expect to have national marketing legislation to bring order and stability to the industry? . . .Until a national marketing act has been developed and proclaimed, provinces will be forced to use whatever measures they can develop to protect the interests of their producers. It is possible that voluntary agreements can be established, but our experience has indicated little success by this method.

Those are the words of Hon. William Stewart, Minister of Agriculture and Food of the province of Ontario. He also stated before the provincial legislature on April 15, 1971:

The government of Ontario is of the opinion that the ultimate solution to the problems of international or interprovincial agriculture trade and supply management must be found at the national level. We believe that Bill C-176, the national marketing bill now before the House of Commons, provides the legislative machinery whereby this national rationalization of production and marketing can be realized.

I am in agreement with his views on this legislation. I believe that many hon. members opposite are also in agreement with the views of the Ontario Minister of Agriculture and Food. I urge the House to give speedy approval to this marketing bill. Due to the nature of the farming industry in Canada and its present organization, we know that many individuals are operating under severe financial stress and strain. They more or less rely on the manufacturer, the consumer or the processor to give them whatever price is going at a given time in the market. This is unfair, because those who are least able to bear the burden receive a lower price than they should for their produce. They do not have the requisite facilities to store their produce long enough to take advantage of higher market prices. Under these circumstances, I urge speedy passage of the bill.

[Mr. Lind.J

Hon. Mr. Stewart, again on April 15, 1971, said:

I suggest that had the national marketing legislation now before the House of Commons been in effect, in my opinion, the problems we now face across Canada would not have occurred, as far as interprovincial marketing problems are concerned.

We all realize, Mr. Speaker, that from time to time we become very regionally minded. We all love our home areas, our home provinces. We all fight for the good of our constituencies. But we must remember that a national farm marketing bill is only enabling legislation supporting the ten provinces of Canada in order that they may have their fair share of the market place for their products.

Some people say that national farm marketing legislation will balkanize Canada. I maintain that it will not. As a matter of fact, we have lived for years under a type of balkanization due to the operations of the Canadian Wheat Board. In 1935 the federal government introduced the Canadian Wheat Board Act which really provided the basis for quotas. It placed restrictions on the movement of grain from one province to another. In essence, there is nothing really new about imposing a type of quota restriction on the movement of products among provinces. This has been going on since 1935.

I believe that the Prairie provinces would not like to do away with the Canadian Wheat Board. They may want to revise the Wheat Board legislation. They might like to reform it a little and bring it up to date. Maybe the board is a little old-fashioned, but the prairie provinces have lived with quotas for years. Quotas could be established under a national farm marketing act upon the advice of a national farm marketing council. I firmly believe that the marketing agencies provided for in the bill would be established only after the results of regional plebiscites had shown that producers in the provinces wanted them.

In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I wish to say that Bill C-176 is simply enabling legislation to permit the provinces to set up their own marketing boards within their jurisdictions. I fully support it and urge that it be given speedy passage.

Full View Permalink

November 17, 1971

Mr. J. G. Lind (Middlesex):

Mr. Speaker, I have a question for the Minister of Consumer and Corporate Affairs. It is my understanding that one of the purposes of the Combines Investigation Act is to ensure continued competition within the business realm. My question is directed to the recent amendment to the Ontario Insurance Act, particularly in so far as it may restrict competition within the life insurance industry. Are the officials of the hon. gentleman's department examining the amendment to the provincial insurance act passed by the present Ontario government in order to determine whether this legislation constitutes a breach of section 32 of the Combines Investigation Act?

Full View Permalink

November 4, 1971

Mr. J. G. Lind (Middlesex):

Mr. Speaker, I wish to direct a question to the Minister of Agriculture. My question is prompted by the minister's announcement of a fowl slaughter program to stabilize egg supplies. How does the minister expect his program to stabilize egg supplies when I understand that eggs are being imported into the Toronto area from the United States at a price which enables the importer to sell his product at a lower cost than the local producer? Could this be considered dumping and is there any way that the government can place a surcharge on these imported eggs to protect our egg producers?

Full View Permalink