James McCrie DOUGLAS

DOUGLAS, James McCrie

Personal Data

Party
Unionist
Constituency
Strathcona (Alberta)
Birth Date
February 5, 1867
Deceased Date
March 16, 1950
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_McCrie_Douglas
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=2d381950-3892-4297-ab44-a57cb29bc414&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
businessman, farmer, merchant

Parliamentary Career

October 20, 1909 - July 29, 1911
LIB
  Strathcona (Alberta)
September 21, 1911 - October 6, 1917
LIB
  Strathcona (Alberta)
December 17, 1917 - October 4, 1921
UNION
  Strathcona (Alberta)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 3 of 72)


April 15, 1921

Mr. DOUGLAS (Strathcona):

Will the minister explain the nature of the surveys that are being made?

Topic:   * COMMONS
Full View Permalink

March 30, 1921

Mr. J. M. DOUGLAS (Strathcona) :

Mr. Speaker, the question of immigration, to my mind, is one of the greatest questions confronting the people of Canada at the present time. At the outset let me say that I have not the slightest sympathy with the resolution propounded by the hon. member for St. Mary's division of Montreal (Mr. Deslauriers). Some facts with regard to the difficulties of admittance of settlers into this country under the present immigration regulations were set forth very clearly by the hon. member for George Etienne Cartier (Mr. Jacobs) and I agree entirely with every statement he made in that regard. In the province from which I come we can accommodate millions of immigrants. The previous speaker (Mr. McQuarrie) stated that, under the regime of Sir Clifford Sifton there came into this country a certain kind of immigration which, in his judgment, was not in the best interest of Canada. He mentioned the class of Doukhobors. Personally, I have no knowledge of the Doukhobors; but I presume, in his classification of Doukhobors, he also included other residents of Austria and Russia who were of the same type, but Who do not hold the same religious convictions which the Doukhobors hold.

In Alberta, we have a large number of foreign-speaking settlers who are now Canadian citizens, men who came from Austria, from Russia, and some from Germany. In spite of any criticism which may have been made as to the immigration policy which was put into effect in 1897 or thereabouts, I make the statement in this House that that immigration policy was the foundation of the success of this country, and that Alberta and the other western provinces

have profited greatly by the settlement of those people on our fertile lands. The regulations in vogue to-day contain so many restrictive measures that a great injustice is being perpetrated on people, particularly 'from certain sections of Europe, coming into this country. Those people, in many instances, are relatives of people living in Western Canada at the present time, who are progressive, well-to-do people, and who are prepared to take the chances of seeing that those people do not become charges on the country. I have had, under my personal observation, many cases of former Austrian citizens, former Russian citizens, former Polish citizens, now living in this country, who are quite prepared to give a bond, if necessary, to the Government that their relatives will not be a charge on the public of this country if they are allowed admittance. But they cannot get in, and yet we see other types of people coming into Canada who are not in the same class whatever as settlers, who are not under any circumstances to be regarded as being of as great value to the country as some of those people whose entry into this country has been prohibited by regulation.

We have a tremendous transportation problem on our hands; we have tremendous resources undeveloped; we have a huge national debt, and if we are ever going to get out of the mire, we must have the people. In my judgment the $250 qualification does not represent the value of an immigrant in the slightest degree. If I might be personal, I might cite the case of my father who came to this country in 1853 with one sovereign in his pocket, and who had to make his way in a country where the advantages at that time were not nearly as great as they are to-day. His case is only one of thousands This country was built up by men of that kind. If we are going to restrict and hamper this class of people we are not going to have a country at all.

Hon. gentlemen have referred to what the United States is doing, but the United States cannot be compared with us at the present time. They have in the neighbourhood of 110,000,000 people, while we have only a paltry 8,000,000 or 9,000,000. We have as large an arable country as they have, yet we are putting up the bars against possible assets in the form of hard-working industrious people who will make this country a place that we shall all be proud to live in. I am entirely in favour of the bars being thrown down to a great extent; at all events, more than they are at the

present time. Give us a policy that will bring the most progressive and strongest type of immigrants to this country, and I have no fear as to what the results will be in the future.

Topic:   UNEMPLOYMENT-SUSPENSION OF IMMIGRATION
Full View Permalink

March 17, 1921

Mr. DOUGLAS:

No, no.

Topic:   SUPPLY-RULE 17C
Subtopic:   STATEMENT OF COMPARATIVE PRICES
Full View Permalink

March 8, 1921

1. What amount of money has been collected by the Government from oil leases in the province of Alberta during the years 1905 to 1920 inclusive?

2. What amount of money has been collected by the Government from gas leases in the province of Alberta during the years 3 905 to 1920 inclusive?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   ALBERTA OIL LEASE RENTALS
Full View Permalink

June 18, 1920

Mr. DOUGLAS (Strathoona):

In connection- with -the list of food products which are exempted under this clause, may I ask the minister if the omission of jams and marmalade from that list has been intentional? Canned fruits -and vegetables are mentioned specifically, but jams and marmalade are omitted for some reason. Was that intentional?

Topic:   SUPPLY.
Subtopic:   SPECIAL WAR REVENUE ACT AMENDMENT, 1915. (BILL 183.)
Full View Permalink