Eugène PAQUET

PAQUET, The Hon. Eugène, P.C., M.D.

Personal Data

Party
Conservative (1867-1942)
Constituency
L'Islet (Quebec)
Birth Date
October 23, 1867
Deceased Date
May 8, 1951
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugène_Paquet
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=22bac231-c23b-4794-8dfb-46bf52cd7616&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
physician

Parliamentary Career

November 3, 1904 - September 17, 1908
CON
  L'Islet (Quebec)
October 26, 1908 - July 29, 1911
CON
  L'Islet (Quebec)
September 21, 1911 - October 6, 1917
CON
  L'Islet (Quebec)
August 14, 1935 - October 6, 1917
CON
  L'Islet (Quebec)
  • Minister of Soldiers' Civil Re-establishment (August 23, 1926 - September 24, 1926)
  • Minister presiding over the Department of Health (August 23, 1926 - September 24, 1926)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 4 of 50)


May 10, 1917

Mr. EUGENE PAQUET (L'IsIet) (translation) :

Mr. Speaker, the remarks of the hon. member for Bagot (Mr. J. E. Marcile) call for a reply on my part. I respect and admire the noble -sentiments expressed by the hon. member in favour of the great cause which we are all defending. I congratulate him on the most noble of sacri-flees, giving his -sons for the safety of his country. But I deplore his strictures against Lieutenant-Colonel Blondin. There is then to be no let up in his attacks against a man who has given his best service to the national cause! My sympathies for the sons of the hon. member for Bagot are deep; but why should I not entertain the same feeling towards a minister of the Crown and a father who has made the -same sacrifices. Last Monday, I attended the meeting at Le Monument National; I wish to point out to my hon. friend that he forgot to tell us that Mr. Descarries, a Liberal member of the Gouin Cabinet, was ridiculed by hecklers during his address.

Last night Mr. Blondin got a very sympa-thi-c hearing at St. Hyacinthe. This also the hon. member failed to mention. All Liberals do not view the action of Lt.-Col. Blondin in the same light. My hon. friend states that at the Montreal meeting the hon. Mr. Blondin got his desserts. I am sure that the leader of the Liberal party does not see eye to eye with my hon. friend. The St. Hyacinthe meeting was presided over by the mayor, Mr. Bene Morin. The distinguished first magistrate buried all political differences to shake the hand of a patriot who is making immense sacrifices for the safety of Canada and the cause of liberty. His Honour the mayor, a staunch Liberal, congratulated Mr. Blondin on his noble action, remarking how the minister was not content with words but followed his words by deeds. Mr. Blondin was the recipient of a remarkable ovation. He deserves the respect and admiration of all those who forget political dissensions when the country's welfare is at -stake. The great and noble action of the hon. Mr. Blondin redounds to the honour of our race at a moment when the country is threatened by many foes.

The hon. member for Bagot has given his views on the social conditions of Canada'" I

Topic:   THE BUDGET.
Subtopic:   DEBATE ON ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MINISTER OF FINANCE.
Full View Permalink

May 2, 1917

Mr. EUGENE PAQUET (L'Islet) (translation) :

Mr. Speaker, with the leave of the House, I shall speak a few words to the resolution proposed by the hon. member for South Perth (Mr. Steele). What is the aim of the resolution?

That, in the opinion of this House, the efficiency ' of the nation depends largely on the physical condition of the people, and in order that the latter may he conserved in the largest possible measure, there should he organized a separate department of the Government having supervision over all matters^ relating to the physical welfare of the Dominion.

In this morning's issue of the Ottawa Citizen, the hon. member for South Perth is reported as seeking to secure the organization of a department of public health, in order to promote the teachings of one particular school. The hon. member has already made it clear to the House that the resolution is no way concerned with the teaching of medical science or the doctrines of any particular school.

The hon. member for South Perth is entitled to the congratulations and thanks of the House. His disquisition is admirable, bearing as it does on a subject which is of interest to the whole Canadian people. It is universally acknowledged that a nation's strength and vigour depends to a great extent on the physical condition of its constituent elements. The great strides made in medical science since the wonderful discoveries of Pasteur, Koch and Lister have saved countless human lives. The results attained in scientific research and modern sanitation account for the preservation of hundreds of thousands of soldiers' lives. The health and strength of the Canadian nation largely depend on the moral, physical and mental qualities of the people and of the foreign element which is bound to come to our shores. Our first care should be to eliminate from among the British and American immigrants, who seek admission, the mentally defective. In Great Britain and the United States it is claimed that

600,000 persons suffer from mental diseases in one form or another. Immigrants should be subjected to a rigid inspection as to their mental condition by experts in disease of

the brain. At a special clinic in a Toronto hospital, it was found, as stated by the hon. member, that a large number of the weak-minded were foreigners. It behooves us then to require a more rigid examination of immigrants, so that any who later might become a menace to the vigour of the race may be refused admittance.

There is nothing in the constitution to prevent the establishment by the Federal Government of a department of public health. Since Confederation, the Federal Governments have dealt with many matters concerning public health, but the enactments of provincial legislatures in that sphere must be kept in mind. In Canada the importance of sanitation is being recognized more and more. In the province of Quebec, to speak only of my province, there is a Board of Public Health which has to deal with the problems of hygiene and to cope with epidemics. Its sphere of utility is being extended every day. In the same province there are health officers who look after hygienic conditions. Last winter, Laval University at Quebec gave lectures on public sanitation, the graduates at the end of the course being awarded a degree in hygienic science. Some of the graduates secure positions as sanitary inspectors.

I feel that the best means of developing the physical welfare of our people is by the establishment of a federal department of public health. But before working out the details of the scheme, representatives of the Provincial and Federal Governments should hold a conference to decide on a [DOT]course of action that would avoid all possible encroachment on provincial jurisdiction. Once a mutual understanding is reached, the proposed department could easily be set in operation. Public health work is extending its usefulness every day, and I have no doubt that such a department in the Federal Administration would soon prove its necessity. At the present time matters concerning the public health are divided among various departments, with no attempt at co-ordinate action, such as could be secured if they were all united under one responsible head.

I wish to call the especial attention of the Government and of the Minister of Inland Revenue to the Act concerning patent medicines. That subject is one for a public health department to consider. I have closely examined the Act and read important articles dealing with the enactment. As a result of a careful study, I should ask the Government and the House

to repeal or amend the law so as to afford a greater measure of protection to the public. It has (been said by a physician: Public health is indeed endangered, because everything, in so far as it is concerned, is done in the dark. It offers a fertile field for the operation of quackery. No doubt as to that.

I wish to congratulate heartily Dr. L. F. Dube, of Notre-Dame-du-Lac, county of Temiscouata, province of Quebec, on the lecture he delivered in the month of September, 1916, before the Commission of Sanitary Services. Whoever reads this dissertation cannot but urge ' an immediate revision of the law concerning patent medicines. With the leave of the House, I shall read the following extract from his lecture:

''When a department or a federal board of public health is established at Ottawa, it-is to be expected that it will be entrusted with the supervision, inspection and control of ail matters coming under the Act, as well as with the enforcement of the law, and control over the sale and manufacture of patent medicines. The work should be carried on under medical officers or health specialists duly authorized."

Medical associations have insisted on the repeal of the present Act, and I cannot urge too strongly the necessity for new legislation. In every department of the service there are at present to be found branches having to do with matters connected with public health, and which should properly be entrusted to one department. The result would be unity of purpose and action, which are indispensable if it is desired to reap all the fruits of modern scientific achievements.

Before resuming my seat, I wish to say a last word of commendation of the hon. member for South Perth (Mr. Steele), for having called the attention of the House and of the Government to such an important subject as that of public health.

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS.
Subtopic:   PHYSICAL WELFARE OF THE CANADIAN PEOPLE.
Full View Permalink

April 26, 1917

Mr. PAQUET:

How many Canadians have been repatriated from the United States during the fiscal years 1913-14, 1914-15, 1915-16, 1916-17?

Topic:   QUESTIONS.
Subtopic:   REPATRIATION OP CANADIANS.
Full View Permalink

April 26, 1917

1. How many immigrants were admitted into Canada during the fiscal year 1916-17?

2. How many immigrants did we get from the United Kingdom in the last fiscal year?

3. How many came from continental Europe during the last fiscal year?

4. How many from the United States?

Topic:   QUESTIONS.
Subtopic:   IMMIGRATION IN 1916-17.
Full View Permalink

April 26, 1917

1. In what seaports are immigrants examined?

2. How many medical inspectors are there in each port, and what are their names and salaries?

3. How many medical inspectors are there on the United States border line?

4. Where do their inspections take place?

5. How many immigration hospitals are there in Canada, and where are they situated?

Topic:   QUESTIONS.
Subtopic:   EXAMINATION OP IMMIGRANTS.
Full View Permalink