David SPENCE

SPENCE, David

Personal Data

Party
Conservative (1867-1942)
Constituency
Parkdale (Ontario)
Birth Date
January 25, 1867
Deceased Date
February 13, 1940
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Spence_(Canadian_politician)
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=1fd6461a-ee02-4d2c-880e-860b930c4499&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
merchant

Parliamentary Career

December 6, 1921 - September 5, 1925
CON
  Parkdale (Ontario)
October 29, 1925 - July 2, 1926
CON
  Parkdale (Ontario)
September 14, 1926 - May 30, 1930
CON
  Parkdale (Ontario)
July 28, 1930 - August 14, 1935
CON
  Parkdale (Ontario)
October 14, 1935 - January 25, 1940
CON
  Parkdale (Ontario)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 4 of 149)


May 31, 1939

Mr. SPENCE:

My opinion is that there

are no departments so antiquated as the public works department and the Post Office Department. They seem to have no business administration whatever; nobody seems to know anything about what anything costs or what it may cost. I have no more complaint to make of the present Minister of Public Works than of any of his predecessors. All of them appear to be imbued with the same spirit; they do not seem to know anything nor do they want to know anything. If they had a proper accounting system, as they should have, when the Post Office Department or any other department asked for a building of certain dimensions the public works department should be able to say, "That will cost you so much." Nothing is charged against the Post Office Department, and that department reports that it makes a million and a half dollars a year. It is charged nothing by the public works department for providing the cleaning, the extra men and the other services pertaining to the post office. I have repeatedly suggested to the committee that the public works department should charge against each department what it does for that department and so ascertain what that department is costing.

The hon. member for Davenport gave a good illustration of how things are operating at present. The system which heats this building goes under the justice building, yet a new heating system is supplied for that building alone. All the administration buildings should be under the same system, which could then be operated at half the cost that is required to-day. There is no study of economy. I find the same trouble with all the Postmasters General; they do not seem to know anything; they do not care to know anything; but I will say this, that the last Postmaster General was getting nearer to perfection than any other Postmaster General I ever knew. The first year he came here he knew nothing at all; the next year he improved. The third year he improved yet further and was able to give us a certain

amount of information. Now we have another Postmaster General starting in new, and I suppose he will not know much until he has been here for some years. I am not criticizing particularly the individual, but I say that the whole administration of this government is absolutely rotten to the core from the point of view of economy. I do not mean that there is any graft; I say that no consideration at all is given to administration from the point of view of economy.

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Full View Permalink

May 30, 1939

Mr. SPENCE:

How many individuals?

Topic:   GOLD CLAUSE OBLIGATIONS
Subtopic:   PROVISION FOR DISCHARGE BT PAYMENT OF NOMINAL OR FACE AMOUNT
Full View Permalink

May 26, 1939

Mr. SPENCE:

Where will this be built?

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND RESOURCES
Full View Permalink

May 26, 1939

Mr. SPENCE:

Does this S700,000 buy the land and construct the building?

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND COMMERCE
Full View Permalink

May 26, 1939

Mr. SPENCE:

And worth about $15,000.

Topic:   DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND COMMERCE
Full View Permalink