Austin Levi FRASER

FRASER, Austin Levi

Personal Data

Party
Conservative (1867-1942)
Constituency
Kings (Prince Edward Island)
Birth Date
March 17, 1868
Deceased Date
April 22, 1946
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Levi_Fraser
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=1ed4a5b5-0642-4aa4-8c1f-c74d0f896aa5&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
lawyer

Parliamentary Career

October 26, 1908 - July 29, 1911
CON
  Kings (Prince Edward Island)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 33)


June 9, 1926

Mr. ERASER:

Heretofore, under the legislation of 1913, the exclusive right of administering these lands was in the province of British Columbia. Now you are taking that exclusive right away from them and asking for a dual administration. Is that the idea?

Railway Belt Water Act

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   RAILWAY BELT WATER ACT AMENDMENT
Full View Permalink

May 20, 1918

Mr. FEASEE:

No, to packages to be sold in our own markets.

Topic:   INSPECTION AND SALE ACT AMENDMENT.
Full View Permalink

May 20, 1918

Mr. FEASEE:

Because this basket has no tacks in it; you cannot put tacks in the bottom of it.

Topic:   INSPECTION AND SALE ACT AMENDMENT.
Full View Permalink

May 12, 1911

Air. FRASER.

The rural mail delivery system can be operated most properly and successfully in Prince Edward Island because that province is much more thickly settled in proportion to its area than any other in Canada, and I hope if this system is generally inaugurated we will have our full share of it. I also think the salaries to the rural postmasters are too small, the minimum should be increased from $35 to $50.

Resolution reported, read the second time, and agreed to.

Air. LEA1IEUX moved for leave to introduce Bill (No. 216) to amend the Post Office Act.

Topic:   S927 COMMONS
Full View Permalink

May 12, 1911

Mr. FRASER.

I wish to endorse what has been said. The railway mail clerks of the east should also come in for some consideration if the minister contemplates an increase in pay to the mail clerks in the west. The railway mail clerk has very arduous duties, his quarters are very cramped and poorly ventilated, and all the conditions that he has to meet with tend to make his life rather a life of hardship. With all this he has a great deal of responsibility, having complete, and absolute control over all the matter in the mail car, registered mail and all other things of the kind. Besides that he literally takes his life in his hands every time he goes on the train. The railway mail clerks should receive the first consideration, because their duties are very hard, and even the post office clerks, I think, receive a very small salary to start on, $500. $400 twenty years ago was worth more than $500 or $600 today, and as the country progresses the government should increase the remuneration of their employees if they wish to keep up the standard of their service. The mail clerks and the post office employees have responsible duties which they perform generally very well. There are very few complaints against the post office in this country. Small payment means poor service in everything. The increase which has been made from $400 to $500 seems a very small one, and the government would find many sympathizers if they could see their way clear to raise the salaries of these people who are doing the hard work in the department. I am well aware that there are many soft snaps in the department where officials are paid relatively much higher salaries. To the railway mail clerks and post office clerks, who actually do hard work, more than $500 should be paid.

Topic:   S927 COMMONS
Full View Permalink