Mel ARNOLD

ARNOLD, Mel

Personal Data

Party
Conservative
Constituency
North Okanagan--Shuswap (British Columbia)
Birth Date
January 1, 1958
Website
http://www.melarnold.ca
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=1ad00957-54b5-494d-8773-b530fbe4967b&Language=E&Section=ALL
Email Address
Mel.Arnold@parl.gc.ca
Profession
business owner

Parliamentary Career

October 19, 2015 -
CPC
  North Okanagan--Shuswap (British Columbia)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 52)


June 20, 2019

Mr. Mel Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap, CPC)

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-467, An Act to establish Royal Canadian Mounted Police Day.

Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to have the opportunity to present this private member's bill today, seconded by my good friend and colleague, the member for Yellowhead. This initiative was started by a small group of constituents in my riding of North Okanagan—Shuswap and the support has grown exponentially across the region, the province and now the country.

February 1, 2020, will mark the 100th anniversary of the forming of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. For almost a century, they have been defending the law, “Maintiens le droit”. This bill would designate February 1 each year as Royal Canadian Mounted Police day. I recognize that it is the end of this 42nd Parliament, but I look forward to returning in the 43rd Parliament to ensure our national police force, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, are recognized for their 100th anniversary.

I want to thank members in my riding, Martin von Holst and Guy Bailey, for their incredible work on this and I look forward to moving this forward when we return in the fall.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

Topic:   Routine Proceedings
Subtopic:   Royal Canadian Mounted Police Day Act
Full View Permalink

June 18, 2019

Mr. Mel Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap, CPC)

Madam Speaker, I thank the member for Davenport for her valiant attempt to defend something that is indefensible. She talked for 20 minutes trying to extol the virtues of this agreement, yet in that 20 minutes she never once mentioned the softwood lumber agreement.

In March 2016, her Prime Minister and her trade minister promised to have a deal framework within 100 days. We are now years past that 100 days and nothing has ever been done by the government on the softwood lumber agreement between Canada and the U.S.

Currently, in my home province, British Columbia, and in my riding of North Okanagan—Shuswap, we have mills shutting down because of the difficulties in the market, because there is no certainty created for them out of this trade deal whatsoever. The Liberals have completely abandoned the softwood lumber agreement and left those mills in limbo.

Could the member explain why she did not even mention that in her 20-minute intervention?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act
Full View Permalink

June 17, 2019

Mr. Mel Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap, CPC)

Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the parliamentary secretary why his government has chosen to cause a division across the country. The bill does not ban the transit of tankers, as the government would like the headlines to read. It really just bans the loading and unloading of those tankers in Canadian waters, which limits our western oil producers from getting their product to market. It is basically regional discrimination against one region of the country over another. Why would his government choose to divide the country in the way it has?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Oil Tanker Moratorium Act
Full View Permalink

June 17, 2019

Mr. Mel Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap, CPC)

Mr. Speaker, I would like to pose a couple of questions to the minister on this time allocation motion.

He has stated numerous times in the last few minutes of debate that there will be another five hours of debate.

I would like to ask the minister this. Has he confirmed with his government House leader that there will be no closure declared on that debate, similar to what the government did on Bill C-69 last week? It closed off debate on that. It closed off discussion on Bill C-69 at the committee stage when there were hundreds of amendments, hundreds even from their own Liberal Party on their own poorly drafted bill. The government closed off debate. It does it time and time again, because it simply does not want to hear the truth.

Will the minister confirm again that there will be no closure and there will be five hours of debate on this bill?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Corrections and Conditional Release Act
Full View Permalink

June 14, 2019

Mr. Mel Arnold

Mr. Speaker, as I stated, my background is in conservation. I see what conservation organizations can do with a few dollars provided and the many hours of volunteer time that they put in at the streams to create fish habitat and to improve hatcheries to make sure we have fish in the streams. A lot of the time, it is not for their own benefit. They do not get to fish for those fish. They do not get to catch anything or reap any harvest from it. They simply are doing it because it is the right thing to do.

That is what these amendments from the Senate were aimed to do. It was to increase the ability of non-profit organizations, including fish and game clubs and conservation organizations, to get into the streams and do some work proactively and create and improve fish habitat. Here we have a government that is scrapping these amendments from the Senate and blocking the possibility for that to happen.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Fisheries Act
Full View Permalink