John Hampden BURNHAM

BURNHAM, John Hampden, B.A., M.A.

Personal Data

Party
Unionist
Constituency
Peterborough West (Ontario)
Birth Date
October 14, 1860
Deceased Date
April 25, 1940
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hampden_Burnham
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=0b65ff12-9c90-415b-937f-308e67da151a&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
lawyer

Parliamentary Career

September 21, 1911 - October 6, 1917
CON
  Peterborough West (Ontario)
December 17, 1917 - July 15, 1920
UNION
  Peterborough West (Ontario)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 3 of 230)


June 22, 1920

Mr. BURNHAM:

The hon. member has laid stress upon the judicial functions of the League of Nations. Now, the very essence of judicial function is that the judges shall have no interest whatever in the suit or matter laid before them for decision. How, therefore, do you carry out the parallel, when the nations concerned have, perhaps, very much of a private national interest in the matter to be determined?

Topic:   COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE
Full View Permalink

June 22, 1920

Mr. BURNHAM:

Will the hon. member explain how the League of Nations proposes to enforce its decisions?

Topic:   COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE
Full View Permalink

June 22, 1920

Mr. BURNHAM:

The League of Nations arrives at certain decisions. Horw does it propose to enforce those decisions?

Topic:   COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE
Full View Permalink

June 21, 1920

Mr. BURNHAM:

Topic:   QUESTIONS.
Subtopic:   DOMINION FRANCHISE ACT.
Full View Permalink

June 21, 1920

Mr. BURNHAM:

It seems to me that logically the system of franchise which a province had created for itself is the system which we ought to adopt for that province. To use a legal phrase, if we adopt the franchise system of the province, that province is estopped from criticising that action on our part. But there was one suggestion which was made, and somewhat dwelt upon by the leader of the Opposition, and that was that in rural subdivisions, or municipalities-subdivisions particularly- if a man finds himself cut off the voters' list when he should be on, he can go into a polling booth, swear that he is entitled to vote, and be allowed to vote. I have as much faith in humanity as probably anybody; I also have some experience, and perhaps I have some common sense; but if anybody thinks that in some townships I know of-they are not in my county-oh, no-that it is perfectly all right to leave an arrangement like that wide open, he has another think coming. What is to prevent people being injected in, say from the West and making false statements?-and people frequently treat it as a joke when it comes to cheating the franchise and the customs. If you have men and women coming in and making these statements, in a close constituency it will turn the election. If you look for them after the deed is done you cannot find them. It is easy. If the vote is to be allowed without any further presumption than that established by the readiness of the party applying to take his oath, the door is wide open for fraud, and certainly in some constituencies and at

some times I know that would be a mild dose of fraud for some people to take. I would sincerely ask the leader of the Opposition to reconsider that idea and to give us something a little more guarded.

Topic:   QUESTIONS.
Subtopic:   DOMINION FRANCHISE ACT.
Full View Permalink