December 16, 2010 (40th Parliament, 3rd Session)


John McKay


Hon. John McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood, Lib.)

Madam Speaker, there is very little in the member's speech with which I would disagree. In fact, I thought he was supremely articulate about the necessity to redress the balance among the provinces.
I have listened to the representative of the Liberal Party, my hon. friend from St. Paul's. I have listened to the hon. member from the New Democratic Party. In all three federalist parties, there does not seem to be much daylight among the various positions. There is a recognition that some inequities will inevitably occur, particularly with P.E.I., the territories and things of that nature, and some niggling around Quebec. However, by and large, there does not seem to be that much disagreement.
The member said that this was one of the most important, if not the most important, bills that had been introduced in the House.
This comment is for the former minister. There would have been a lot less heat about the bill and possibly a lot more light had there been some preliminary discussions with the various parties so the differences could have been narrowed and dealt with in a bill.
I would be interested to hear the member's comments on that.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Democratic Representation Act
Full View