Mr. Speaker, I should just like to make the very brief point that whatever the situation may be in
June 5, 1972
strict, regular fashion-and I do not really quarrel with Your Honour's approach to the interpretation here-we are in a peculiar situation, having the bill restored to the report stage with the bulk of the original proposal as contained in the original bill. I think the recommendation is broad enough to support this amendment and for that reason I would not argue against its admissibility at this point.
Subtopic: AMENDMENTS RESPECTING DETERMINATION OF PAYMENT FOR WHEAT-EXTENSION OF APPLICATION TO FLAXSEED, RYE AND RAPESEED