December 18, 1962 (25th Parliament, 1st Session)

NDP

William Arnold Peters

New Democratic Party

Mr. Peters:

I presume, therefore, that we should proceed to study the evidence given by these gentlemen so that we can judge for ourselves in this particular case. The record tells us:
George Roland Foucher appeared as a witness on behalf of the petitioner and. having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
Q. What is your full name?
A. George Roland Foucher.
Q. What is your age?

Q. Where do you live?
A. Montreal.
Q. What is your occupation?
A. Investigator.
Here, Mr. Chairman, is the point at which I suggest the question should have been asked whether or not the witness has been found guilty of any infraction of the law in relation to his occupation. This question should have been replied to in the negative-*

Topic:   INTERIM SUPPLY
Subtopic:   BRUCE REID CAMPBELL
Full View