Then he is responsible for the purchase of that whisky. I could understand why the hon. gentleman should smile so benignly if he had a hooker himself, but I do object to his spending the
people's money in this way and then going around the country parading himself as the head of the prohibitionists. But that is just like the party to which he belongs- deceitful in all things and desperately wicked. The idea of his taking the people's money and spending it in this way and then coming here and smiling so blandly and saying he is not responsible. Who drank the whisky ? It is very easy to shake your head when there is not anything in it.