October 4, 2000

PC

Norman E. Doyle

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Norman Doyle

Progressive Conservative members are voting in favour of the motion, Mr. Speaker.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1414
Permalink
REF
REF

Jake Hoeppner

Reform

Mr. Jake E. Hoeppner

Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes yea to this motion.

(The House divided on Motion No. 39, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1414
Permalink
?

The Speaker

I declare Motion No. 39 carried. The next question is on Motion No. 54.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
LIB

Bob Kilger

Liberal

Mr. Bob Kilger

Mr. Speaker, I wish to inform you that the member for Glengarry—Prescott—Russell could not be here for this vote. However, I think you would find unanimous consent for the members who voted on the previous motion to be recorded has having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberals voting nay.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
?

The Speaker

Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
?

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
REF

John Reynolds

Reform

Mr. John Reynolds

Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present vote yea.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
BQ

Stéphane Bergeron

Bloc Québécois

Mr. Stéphane Bergeron

Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois will vote no to this motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
NDP

Yvon Godin

New Democratic Party

Mr. Yvon Godin

Mr. Speaker, the members of the NDP will vote in favour of this motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
PC

Norman E. Doyle

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Norman Doyle

Mr. Speaker, Progressive Conservative members are voting against this motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
REF
REF

Jake Hoeppner

Reform

Mr. Jake E. Hoeppner

Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes no.

(The House divided on Motion No. 54, which was negatived on the following division:)

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1416
Permalink
?

The Speaker

I declare Motion No. 54 lost.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1419
Permalink
LIB

Bob Kilger

Liberal

Mr. Bob Kilger

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I believe there is consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to Motion No. 50.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1419
Permalink
?

The Speaker

Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1419
Permalink
?

Some hon. members

Agreed.

(The House divided on Motion No. 50, which was negatived on the following division:)

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1419
Permalink
?

The Speaker

I declare Motion No. 50 lost. The next question is on Motion No. 17. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 18 to 20.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1423
Permalink
LIB

Bob Kilger

Liberal

Mr. Bob Kilger

Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1423
Permalink
?

The Speaker

Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1423
Permalink

October 4, 2000