Norman E. Doyle
Progressive Conservative
Mr. Norman Doyle
Progressive Conservative members are voting in favour of the motion, Mr. Speaker.
Subtopic: Division No. 1414
Mr. Norman Doyle
Progressive Conservative members are voting in favour of the motion, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Jack Ramsay
Mr. Speaker, I vote yea.
Mr. Jake E. Hoeppner
Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes yea to this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 39, which was agreed to on the following division:)
I declare Motion No. 39 carried. The next question is on Motion No. 54.
Mr. Bob Kilger
Mr. Speaker, I wish to inform you that the member for Glengarry—Prescott—Russell could not be here for this vote. However, I think you would find unanimous consent for the members who voted on the previous motion to be recorded has having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberals voting nay.
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Agreed.
Mr. John Reynolds
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present vote yea.
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois will vote no to this motion.
Mr. Yvon Godin
Mr. Speaker, the members of the NDP will vote in favour of this motion.
Mr. Norman Doyle
Mr. Speaker, Progressive Conservative members are voting against this motion.
Mr. Jack Ramsay
I vote yea, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Jake E. Hoeppner
Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes no.
(The House divided on Motion No. 54, which was negatived on the following division:)
I declare Motion No. 54 lost.
Mr. Bob Kilger
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I believe there is consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to Motion No. 50.
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 50, which was negatived on the following division:)
I declare Motion No. 50 lost. The next question is on Motion No. 17. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 18 to 20.
Mr. Bob Kilger
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?