October 4, 2000


The House resumed from September 28 consideration of Bill C-8, an act respecting marine conservation areas, as reported (with amendment) from the committee.


?

The Speaker

Pursuant to order made on Friday, September 29, 2000, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions on the report stage of Bill C-8.

The question is on Motion No. 1. The vote on Motion No. 1 also applies to Motions Nos. 2, 3, 7, 12, 13, 26 to 29, 37, 40 to 48, 53, 55, 56, 59 and 60.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
LIB

Bob Kilger

Liberal

Mr. Bob Kilger

Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find unanimous consent to apply the vote just completed on the previous motion to the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
?

The Speaker

Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
?

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
REF

John Reynolds

Reform

Mr. John Reynolds

Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present vote yes to this motion and, as I mentioned, the member for Yorkton—Melville had to leave.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
BQ

Stéphane Bergeron

Bloc Québécois

Mr. Stéphane Bergeron

Mr. Speaker, Bloc members, with the exception of the member for Laurier—Sainte-Marie, who had to withdraw, are in favour of the motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
NDP

Yvon Godin

New Democratic Party

Mr. Yvon Godin

Mr. Speaker, members of the New Democratic Party, with the exception of the member for Regina—Qu'Appelle, who had to withdraw, are opposed to the motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
PC

Norman E. Doyle

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Norman Doyle

Mr. Speaker, members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting no to the motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
REF

Keith Martin

Reform

Mr. Keith Martin

Mr. Speaker, I will be voting against the motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
REF

Jack Ramsay

Reform

Mr. Jack Ramsay

Mr. Speaker, I will be voting in support of the motion.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
REF

Jake Hoeppner

Reform

Mr. Jake E. Hoeppner

Mr. Speaker, I will be voting no.

(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Marine Conservation Areas Act
Permalink
?

The Speaker

I declare Motion No. 1 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 2, 3, 7, 12, 13, 26 to 29, 37, 40 to 48, 53, 55, 56, 59 and 60 lost.

The next question is on Motion No. 4.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1395
Permalink
LIB

Bob Kilger

Liberal

Mr. Bob Kilger

Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find unanimous consent to apply the results of the last vote to Motions Nos. 4, 8, 10, 14, 21, 30, 38, 51, 16 and 49.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1395
Permalink
?

The Speaker

Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1395
Permalink
?

Some hon. members

Agreed.

(The House divided on Motion No. 4, which was negatived on the following division:)

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1395
Permalink
?

The Speaker

I declare Motions Nos. 4, 8, 10, 14, 21, 30, 38, 51, 16 and 49 lost.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1422
Permalink
NDP

Yvon Godin

New Democratic Party

Mr. Yvon Godin

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. We would like to add the hon. member for Regina—Qu'Appelle to the motion just passed.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1422
Permalink
?

The Speaker

The next question is on Motion No. 5.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1422
Permalink
LIB

Bob Kilger

Liberal

Mr. Bob Kilger

Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Division No. 1422
Permalink

October 4, 2000