March 25, 1981

?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   GRAIN TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT AT PORT OF PRINCE RUPERT-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   GRAIN TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT AT PORT OF PRINCE RUPERT-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

THE CONSTITUTION

LIB

David Berger

Liberal

Mr. David Berger (Laurier):

Madam Speaker, I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43 on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity. In view of the fact that on Monday, March 23, the Prime Minister (Mr. Trudeau) made one of the most important speeches in Canadian history and that neither CBC, CTV nor Tele Metropole in Quebec broadcast this historic event, 1 move, seconded by the hon. member for Kitchener (Mr. Lang):

That the television networks fulfil their responsibility of keeping the Canadian public informed, particularly on matters of fundamental importance to our nation, by rebroadcasting the Prime Minister's speech as well as those of the opposition leaders.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Hear, hear!

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
PC

Charles Joseph Clark (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Clark:

Settle the strike.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Oh, oh!

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   THE CONSTITUTION
Sub-subtopic:   BROADCASTING OF PARTY LEADERS' SPEECHES ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink

INCOME TAX

PC

Benno Friesen

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Benno Friesen (Surrey-White Rock-North Delta):

Madam Speaker, I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43. Whereas the education deduction for full-time post-secondary school students of $50 a month, first introduced in 1972, has never been increased, and in view of the fact that since that time the cost of living has almost doubled, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Brampton-Georgetown (Mr. McDermid):

That as a result of the fact that tuition fees, accommodation and other expenses for students have almost doubled since 1972, that this House recognize that students are as much affected by inflation as are other groups by urging the government to table a ways and means motion which would increase the present

maximum deduction of $50 per month to a level more in line with the harsh realities of the eroded purchasing power of the dollar.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INCOME TAX
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED INCREASE IN EDUCATION DEDUCTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INCOME TAX
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED INCREASE IN EDUCATION DEDUCTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INCOME TAX
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED INCREASE IN EDUCATION DEDUCTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INCOME TAX
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED INCREASE IN EDUCATION DEDUCTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

MARINE TRANSPORT

PC

J. Michael Forrestall

Progressive Conservative

Mr. J. M. Forrestall (Dartmouth-Halifax East):

Madam Speaker, I am pleased to see the Minister of Transport in his seat. Under the provisions of Standing Order 43, I rise to move the following motion.

Failure of the government to move in extending the fuel surcharge exemption to all Canadian flagships operating out of Canadian ports will add some $30 million to the operational costs of those fleets and thus seriously erode their competitive position offshore, as well as creating an unacceptable administrative burden for the government with respect to policing it. I move, seconded by the hon. member for Vegreville (Mr. Mazankowski):

That this House urges the government to extend its exemption on fuel surcharges to all Canadian flagships so as to bring into line all of the transportation modes, not later than March 31, 1981.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MARINE TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   FUEL SURCHARGE EXEMPTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MARINE TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   FUEL SURCHARGE EXEMPTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MARINE TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   FUEL SURCHARGE EXEMPTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MARINE TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   FUEL SURCHARGE EXEMPTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

March 25, 1981