March 20, 1981

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

DISABLED AND THE HANDICAPPED

PC

Claude Girvin (Girve) Fretz

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Girve Fretz (Erie):

Madam Speaker, I rise on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity. If Bill C-42 is passed without amendment to its monopoly provisions, serious harm will be done to organizations which provide meaningful and remunerative employment for the mentally retarded who have contracted with private business to hand deliver billings, an example of such organization being N-Tec in my riding. Therefore I move, seconded by the hon. member for Lisgar (Mr. Murta):

That this House urge the government to provide an example and a symbol to all Canadians, in the Year of the Handicapped, by excluding groups such as N-Tec from the monopoly provisions of the bill, thereby allowing members of such groups to have a sense of worth and dignity too often denied them.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   DISABLED AND THE HANDICAPPED
Sub-subtopic:   EXEMPTION FROM PROVISIONS OF POST OFFICE CROWN CORPORATION LEGISLATION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   DISABLED AND THE HANDICAPPED
Sub-subtopic:   EXEMPTION FROM PROVISIONS OF POST OFFICE CROWN CORPORATION LEGISLATION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   DISABLED AND THE HANDICAPPED
Sub-subtopic:   EXEMPTION FROM PROVISIONS OF POST OFFICE CROWN CORPORATION LEGISLATION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   DISABLED AND THE HANDICAPPED
Sub-subtopic:   EXEMPTION FROM PROVISIONS OF POST OFFICE CROWN CORPORATION LEGISLATION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

INDUSTRY

PC

William James Kempling (Chief Opposition Whip; Whip of the Progressive Conservative Party)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Bill Kempling (Burlington):

Madam Speaker, under the provisions of Standing Order 43, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Nepean-Carleton (Mr. Baker):

That the government proceed immediately with discussions that will allow the Canadian rubber industry to rationalize production with all possible speed, so that markets can be secured in an increasingly competitive industry and the experienced labour force will not be dispersed by plant closures which are sure to follow if rationalization of production is not achieved.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   RATIONALIZATION OF PRODUCTION OF RUBBER MANUFACTURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   RATIONALIZATION OF PRODUCTION OF RUBBER MANUFACTURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   RATIONALIZATION OF PRODUCTION OF RUBBER MANUFACTURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   RATIONALIZATION OF PRODUCTION OF RUBBER MANUFACTURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

PC

Frank Oberle

Progressive Conservative

Mr. F. Oberle (Prince George-Peace River):

Madam Speaker, having regard to the government's plans to impose closure once again with respect to the constitutional debate presently before the House, and considering the fundamental importance of this debate to the future of our country, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Cariboo-Chilcotin (Mr. Greenaway):

That, in order to provide an opportunity not only for members of the House but for every Canadian to reflect soberly upon what has so far been said in the debate leading to changes in our Constitution and to free up time for the House to consider other important matters dealing with the economy, any further debate on the Constitution be postponed until such time as to allow the people of the province of Quebec to choose a new government, and to allow all Canadians to become sufficiently acquainted with all the facts connected to the proposal for constitutional reform before we arrive at a final decision.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Sub-subtopic:   POSTPONEMENT OF DEBATE ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Sub-subtopic:   POSTPONEMENT OF DEBATE ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Sub-subtopic:   POSTPONEMENT OF DEBATE ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Sub-subtopic:   POSTPONEMENT OF DEBATE ON CONSTITUTIONAL RESOLUTION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE

NDP

Svend Johannes Robinson

New Democratic Party

Mr. Svend J. Robinson (Burnaby):

Madam Speaker, I rise on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order 43. In view of the fact that the Liberal government proposed a massive increase in the provincial and municipal shares of the costs of RCMP contracts, an increase unanimously opposed by the eight attorneys general of the provinces involved, and that this increase, of over 100 per cent in some cases, represents an additional tax burden of over $2 million next year for the taxpayers of Burnaby alone, with no improved accountability, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Regina East (Mr. de Jong):

That this House condemn these massive additional costs for RCMP contract services being imposed upon eight provinces and hundreds of municipalities throughout Canada, and calls upon the government to reconsider this decision or, at the very least, to provide for a phasing in period to help the hard-pressed taxpayers of Burnaby and elsewhere absorb this further federal raid on their pocketbooks.

March 20, 1981

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE
Sub-subtopic:   ADDITIONAL COST OF SERVICE TO PROVINCES AND MUNICIPALITIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent for this motion?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE
Sub-subtopic:   ADDITIONAL COST OF SERVICE TO PROVINCES AND MUNICIPALITIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE
Sub-subtopic:   ADDITIONAL COST OF SERVICE TO PROVINCES AND MUNICIPALITIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

March 20, 1981