May 15, 1980

?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INCOME TAX ACT
Sub-subtopic:   DEDUCTIONS FOR CHILD CARE EXPENSES-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INCOME TAX ACT
Sub-subtopic:   DEDUCTIONS FOR CHILD CARE EXPENSES-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink

AIR TRANSPORT

NDP

Douglas Keith Anguish

New Democratic Party

Mr. Doug Anguish (The Battlefords-Meadow Lake):

Madam Speaker, I rise on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity under the provisions of Standing Order 43.

Whereas the Battlefords, an area serving a population of

30,000 people, has no regular air service, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Humboidt-Lake Centre (Mr. Althouse):

That the Ministry of Transport commence immediate discussions with the town of Battleford, the city of North Battleford, the Northwest Economic Development Council, the rural municipalities of the area and an air carrier to assure regular air service to the Battlefords.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIR TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REGULAR AIR CARRIER SERVICE TO BATTLEFORD, SASK - MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Such a motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIR TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REGULAR AIR CARRIER SERVICE TO BATTLEFORD, SASK - MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIR TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REGULAR AIR CARRIER SERVICE TO BATTLEFORD, SASK - MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIR TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REGULAR AIR CARRIER SERVICE TO BATTLEFORD, SASK - MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink

VETERANS AFFAIRS

PC

Thomas Michael McMillan

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Tom McMillan (Hillsborough):

Madam Speaker, I rise, under the provisions of Standing Order 43, on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity.

In view of the fact that the Minister of Public Works yesterday tabled in the House the analysis on which the government based its decision to move the site for the Department of Veterans Affairs from the Charlottetown waterfront to the centre of that city, and in view of the fact that the analysis is riddled with factual errors, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Don Valley West (Mr. Bosley):

That this House condemn the minister for tabling and acting on such a document, and that the minister appear before the Standing Committee on National Resources and Public Works to explain the errors and inaccuracies in that document.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   VETERANS AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   LOCATION OF DVA OFFICES IN CHARLOTTETOWN-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Such a motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   VETERANS AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   LOCATION OF DVA OFFICES IN CHARLOTTETOWN-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   VETERANS AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   LOCATION OF DVA OFFICES IN CHARLOTTETOWN-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   VETERANS AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   LOCATION OF DVA OFFICES IN CHARLOTTETOWN-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

NEW BRUNSWICK-SALE OF ELECTRICITY TO MAINE-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43

PC

Robert Alfred Corbett

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Bob Corbett (Fundy-Royal):

Madam Speaker, 1 rise, under the provisions of Standing Order 43, on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity.

According to recent reports, the Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources has initiated action within his department which would alter an agreement between New Brunswick and Maine whereby New Brunswick sells electrical power to Maine from its oil-fired thermal generating station in Saint John. In view of the fact that the contract has enabled New Brunswick to construct the facility which employs 140 workers, and was entered into in good faith, I move, seconded by the hon. member for York-Sunbury (Mr. Howie):

That the minister assure the province, through this House, that he will not jeopardize either the contract between New Brunswick and Maine nor the future operation of the plant by fiddling with oil subsidies as they apply to generating stations.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NEW BRUNSWICK-SALE OF ELECTRICITY TO MAINE-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Such a motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NEW BRUNSWICK-SALE OF ELECTRICITY TO MAINE-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NEW BRUNSWICK-SALE OF ELECTRICITY TO MAINE-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NEW BRUNSWICK-SALE OF ELECTRICITY TO MAINE-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

NATIONAL ANTHEM

LIB

Jesse Philip Flis

Liberal

Mr. Jesse P. Flis (Parkdale-High Park):

Madam Speaker, 1 seek the attention of all hon. members of this House on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity under the provisions of Standing Order 43.

In view of the fact that Canada does not have a national anthem, a fact not known by many Canadians, and in light of the fact that the year 1980 has drawn much attention to national unity and to the patriation of the constitution, I move, seconded by the hon. member from Verdun (Mr. Savard):

That this House officially recognize "O Canada" as the national anthem and "God Save the Queen" as the royal anthem.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL ANTHEM
Sub-subtopic:   RECOGNITION OF "O CANADA"-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

Jeanne Sauvé (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Madam Speaker:

Such a motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL ANTHEM
Sub-subtopic:   RECOGNITION OF "O CANADA"-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

May 15, 1980