December 11, 1979

LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

Denis Éthier

Liberal

Mr. Ethier:

I cannot accept that, Mr. Speaker. I want to be heard on this.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

Denis Éthier

Liberal

Mr. Ethier:

Your Honour invited me yesterday to read his comments.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

Denis Éthier

Liberal

Mr. Ethier:

I want to be heard on this.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Statements by ministers.

Order Paper Questions

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

Denis Éthier

Liberal

Mr. Ethier:

I would certainly like to be heard, Mr. Speaker.

December 11, 1979

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink
LIB

Denis Éthier

Liberal

Mr. Ethier:

I think I have a very valid question of privilege and I would like to be heard.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MR. ETHIER-ALLEGED ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO POLITICAL GROUP
Permalink

QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER


(Questions answered orally are indicated by an asterisk.)


PC

William Hannum Wightman (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Bill Wightman (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Labour):

Mr. Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 4, 14, 177, 410, 412, 468, 504, 590 and 669.

I ask, Mr. Speaker, that the remaining questions be allowed to stand.

[ Text]

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Permalink
PC

Mr. Cossitt

Progressive Conservative

1. Since April 20, 1968, did the government pay for legal services to Mr. Hugh R. Hart, Solicitor, Brockville, Ontario, or to the firm with which he is associated and, if so (a) what was the total amount (b) what was the amount by fiscal or calendar year (c) for which departments did he act and, in each case, what is the breakdown of the amounts received (d) what is a general description of each case he has handled?

2. What are all the reasons that Mr. Hart has been or is employed by the government and specifically, is one of these the fact that he is a member of the Executive of the local Liberal party?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   MR. HUGH R. HART
Permalink
PC

Robert Jarvis (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources)

Progressive Conservative

Hon. Bill Jarvis (Minister of State for Federal-Provincial Relations):

1. The Department of Justice: Yes.

(a) $58,251.15 (to September 30, 1979).

(b) See list below.

(c) See list below.

(d) See list below.

2. In reply to the first part of this question, Mr. Hart competently carried out the mandates assigned to him. The reply to the second part of the question is no.

H. and W. C. R. C. T.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   MR. HUGH R. HART
Permalink

T.and C. 6,717.50(0 305.00(C) 4,637.49(0 10.224.79(C) 477.99(C) 4,593.75(0 142.50(C) 35.00(C) 262.48(C) 78-79 79 to 30 Sept. 79 6.199.22(C) 3,758.05(0 376.25(C) Environment Canada C. C. A.



D. V. A. E. M. R. I. and N. A. 506.00 175.00(C) 1,703.50(P) 359.75(P) 58.33(C) Secretary of State 75.81(C) Total 7,022.50 5,143.49 12,406.28 5,208.73 6,693.11 4,134.30 C-Criminal Prosecutions D-Property Grand Total-58,251.15 20 Apr. 68-69 69-70 70-71 71-72 72-73 73-74H. and W. C. R. C. T. R. C. C. E. T. and C. Environment Canada C. C. A. U. I. C. D. V. A. E. M. R. I. and N. A. 616.00(C) 260.55(C) 30.00(C) 225.00(C) 1,608.50(P) I21.80(P) 435.00(C) 2,615.50(0 40.00(C) 1.848.28(C) 1,689.46(0 285.00(C) 977.50(C) 6.890.15(C)Secretary of State Total 2,861.85 435.00 2,655.50 1,848.28 2,951.96 6,890.15 C-Criminal Prosecutions P-Property December 11, 1979


NDP

Mr. Orlikow

New Democratic Party

In each of the past five years, by department, for each occupational group earning $20,000 or more in 1978 and 1979, how many (a) public service positions were reclassified upward (green-circled) and/or downward (red-circled) (b) individuals continued to hold a public service position after the position had been reclassified?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE-POSITIONS RECLASSIFIED
Permalink
PC

Sinclair McKnight Stevens (President of the Treasury Board)

Progressive Conservative

Hon. Sinclair Stevens (President of Treasury Board):

To

provide a complete reply would entail a costly and time-consuming examination of all personnel and incumbent files in all departments and agencies. The cost of this study would be prohibitive in terms of both manpower and time.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE-POSITIONS RECLASSIFIED
Permalink
LIB

Mr. Herbert

Liberal

1. (a) What was the total CAST commitment to NATO, in numbers of men, agreed to by Canada when it was first entered into (b) which units were tasked to provide these men (c) what equipment was committed to this force?

2. What have been the changes in the commitment in (a) numbers of men (b) the units which were tasked to provide the men (c) the equipment which was committed to this force and, in each case, what was the date that a change was made?

3. (a) What was the total CAST commitment in numbers of men, as of January 1, 1979 (b) which units were tasked to provide them (c) what equipment was committed to this force?

4. (a) What is the planned total CAST commitment by Canada in numbers of men, effective September 1980, in light of the Minister of National Defence's statement on October 31, 1978 (b) which units are earmarked to provide them (c) what equipment is it planned to commit to this force?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   NATO-CAST COMMITMENT
Permalink

December 11, 1979