February 14, 1979

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

GOVERNMENT SERVICES

PC

David Samuel Horne MacDonald

Progressive Conservative

Mr. David MacDonald (Egmont):

Mr. Speaker, I rise in conformity with the provisions of Standing Order 43. In light of the inability of the federal government to explain its unilateral termination of support for the land registration and information service, and its failure to complete its obligations to the three maritime provinces for an up to date land registry system, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Dartmouth-Halifax East (Mr. Forrestall):

That the Prime Minister immediately indicate the increased cost to these three provinces to complete the changeover to this new system or the reversal to the former one, secondly, the lost revenue which would have been forthcoming in the development of a new export technology for the region and, finally, the number of jobs lost in the exodus of many highly trained personnel.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   LAND REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE IN ATLANTIC PROVINCES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

The introduction of such a motion requires unanimous consent. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   LAND REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE IN ATLANTIC PROVINCES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   LAND REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE IN ATLANTIC PROVINCES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   LAND REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE IN ATLANTIC PROVINCES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

NDP

Francis Andrew Brewin

New Democratic Party

Mr. Andrew Brewin (Greenwood):

Mr. Speaker, I have a motion under Standing Order 43. I move, seconded by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre (Mr. Knowles):

That this House, in light of the failure of the Argentine to subscribe to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, the fact that the Canadian government seems to be entirely dependent on the information from the government of the Argentine, without any system of monitoring infractions, and the AECL now proposes to provide additional reactors or components of them which can be used for the production of plutonium or nuclear weapon material, urges the Canadian government to refrain from authorizing AECL to proceed with any further sales of reactors or components thereof until the Argentine has accepted the nonproliferation treaty or provided an adequate means of monitoring the use of reactors and components provided by Canada.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTORS TO ARGENTINA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Such a motion can be introduced for discussion at this time only with the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTORS TO ARGENTINA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTORS TO ARGENTINA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTORS TO ARGENTINA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

NATIONAL SECURITY

PC

Elmer MacIntosh MacKay (Progressive Conservative Party Caucus Chair)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Elmer M. MacKay (Central Nova):

Mr. Speaker, my motion under the provisions of Standing Order 43 involves the security procedures policy of the federal government.

In view of requirements and procedures involving security as set out in a government security administration manual, section 11-3, which is several years old, and in view of the obvious need to rethink security matters because of the conditions over which several solicitors general have presided during the past few years, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Edmonton Centre (Mr. Paproski):

That the Solicitor General or the Prime Minister indicate on motions, soon, to what extent change of marital status or residence within the past ten years in foreign countries, or having close relatives living within the borders of foreign nations, still impedes an individual obtaining security clearance, so that at least Canadians will know some of the rules which can affect them so drastically.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCEDURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Such a motion can be presented for debate at this time only with the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCEDURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCEDURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCEDURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
PC

Steve Eugene Paproski

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Paproski:

Norm Cafik said no.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCEDURES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

CENTRAL MORTGAGE AND HOUSING CORPORATION

PC

Jean Elizabeth Pigott

Progressive Conservative

Mrs. Jean E. Pigott (Ottawa-Carleton):

Mr. Speaker, I rise, under the provisions of Standing Order 43, on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity.

February 14, 1979

In light of the growing reports in all areas of the country about alleged violations of the National Building Code and charges that CMHC is being forced to operate on a system of patronage, and in view of the serious lack of control in the financial and management procedures of Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation, I move, seconded by the hon. member for St. John's East (Mr. McGrath):

That this House immediately call on the Auditor General of Canada to undertake a detailed inspection of the financial management and controls of CMHC for the last fiscal year and, further, that this House direct the Minister of State for Urban Affairs to make an immediate reference to the standing committee to investigate and examine the reports of the series of articles in the Hamilton Spectator entitled "CMHC, the greatest national drain".

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CENTRAL MORTGAGE AND HOUSING CORPORATION
Sub-subtopic:   CALL FOR AUDITOR GENERAL'S DETAILED INSPECTION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLS OF CORPORATION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Such a motion can be presented for debate only with unanimous consent. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CENTRAL MORTGAGE AND HOUSING CORPORATION
Sub-subtopic:   CALL FOR AUDITOR GENERAL'S DETAILED INSPECTION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLS OF CORPORATION-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

February 14, 1979