February 25, 1976

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

PENITENTIARIES

PC

Ramon John Hnatyshyn (Deputy House Leader of the Official Opposition; Progressive Conservative Party Deputy House Leader)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Ray Hnatyshyn (Saskatoon-Biggar):

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity under the terms of Standing Order 43. On February 10, the Solicitor General indicated he would provide details of the criteria or methods used by the penitentiary system to determine priorities for psychiatric treatment. Since it now appears there are no such criteria of general application and since the so-called peace and security legislation introduced to the House yesterday is silent in the area of the psychiatric treatment of inmates in Canadian penitentiaries, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Surrey-White Rock (Mr. Friesen):

That this House direct the Solicitor General to immediately prepare criteria for priorities of psychiatric treatment and table same in the House with an accompanying motion for the consideration thereof by the Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PENITENTIARIES
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR CRITERIA FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT FOR INMATES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Pursuant to Standing Order 43 this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House before it can be put. Is there such consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PENITENTIARIES
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR CRITERIA FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT FOR INMATES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PENITENTIARIES
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR CRITERIA FOR PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT FOR INMATES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

MANPOWER

SC

Eudore Allard

Social Credit

Mr. Eudore Allard (Rimouski):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order 43, I ask the unanimous consent of the House to discuss an important matter of pressing necessity.

In view of the fact that the real number of unemployed workers had risen to 241,000 in January from 216,000 in December 1975 that, at the present time, there is a very substantial increase of the unemployment rate in Quebec, especially among young people and, also, that an amount of $4 billion is to be spent in 1975-76 in unemployment insurance benefits, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Champlain (Mr. Matte):

That this House immediately take all necessary steps to enable the federal government to reassess the job creating programs now in effect

so that Canadian workers, specially in Quebec, regain confidence and finally, the fight against inflation may be as effective as possible.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MANPOWER
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR RE-EVALUATION OF JOB CREATING PROGRAMS TO COUNTER UNEMPLOYMENT-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

The House has heard the motion of the hon. member. Pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order 43, this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there such a consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MANPOWER
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR RE-EVALUATION OF JOB CREATING PROGRAMS TO COUNTER UNEMPLOYMENT-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MANPOWER
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR RE-EVALUATION OF JOB CREATING PROGRAMS TO COUNTER UNEMPLOYMENT-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MANPOWER
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR RE-EVALUATION OF JOB CREATING PROGRAMS TO COUNTER UNEMPLOYMENT-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimous consent; the motion therefore cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   MANPOWER
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR RE-EVALUATION OF JOB CREATING PROGRAMS TO COUNTER UNEMPLOYMENT-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink

NATIONAL DEFENCE

PC

J. Michael Forrestall

Progressive Conservative

Mr. J. M. Forrestall (Dartmouth-Halifax East):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 43 I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to discuss an urgent and important matter, at least to Atlantic Canada. The urgency arises out of replies given in the House yesterday by the Minister of National Defence with respect to base closing and consolidation studies. Because the report with respect to base closure is expected to be presented to the minister and cabinet in March, and having regard to the economic impact of such a development, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Annapolis Valley (Mr. Nowlan):

That this House instruct the Minister of National Defence to seek assurances from his colleague, the minister responsible for regional economic development, that any base closure will not result in widespread civilian lay-offs or undue economic hardship for the region concerned.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ASSURANCE CLOSURE OF BASES WILL NOT RESULT IN ECONOMIC HARDSHIP FOR REGION CONCERNED-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Pursuant to the terms of Standing Order 43, unanimous consent is required before the motion can be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ASSURANCE CLOSURE OF BASES WILL NOT RESULT IN ECONOMIC HARDSHIP FOR REGION CONCERNED-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ASSURANCE CLOSURE OF BASES WILL NOT RESULT IN ECONOMIC HARDSHIP FOR REGION CONCERNED-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

SUPPLY AND SERVICES

NDP

Andrew Hogan

New Democratic Party

Mr. Andy Hogan (Cape Breton-East Richmond):

Mr. Speaker, I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43 on a matter of pressing and urgent necessity. It was reported yesterday that Japan's upper and lower houses have

February 25, 1976

Consumer Affairs

called on the United States government and Senate to release all undisclosed information on Lockheed's bribery payments. It is well known, as well, that the general accounting office of the United States government has warned the U.S. Congress that Lockheed may fail to meet the 1978 deadline for repaying the $195 million it borrowed under a government loan guarantee. I move, seconded by the hon. member for Sault Ste. Marie (Mr. Symes):

That the Canadian government follow the Japanese example and request all undisclosed information on Lockheed bribery payments and, as well, in view of the apparent shaky financial position of that corporation, we request the Minister of National Defence (Mr. Richardson) to consider immediate cancellation of contract proceedings with Lockheed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO REQUEST INFORMATION ON LOCKHEED'S BRIBERY PAYMENTS AND TO CANCEL CONTRACT-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please. Pursuant to Standing Order 43 the motion can only be presented with the unanimous consent of the House.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO REQUEST INFORMATION ON LOCKHEED'S BRIBERY PAYMENTS AND TO CANCEL CONTRACT-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO REQUEST INFORMATION ON LOCKHEED'S BRIBERY PAYMENTS AND TO CANCEL CONTRACT-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO REQUEST INFORMATION ON LOCKHEED'S BRIBERY PAYMENTS AND TO CANCEL CONTRACT-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

February 25, 1976