February 17, 1976

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

AGRICULTURE

SC

Joseph Adrien Henri Lambert

Social Credit

Mr. Adrien Lambert (Bellechasse):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 43, I ask the unanimous consent of the House to move a motion dealing with an important matter of pressing necessity.

Since the producers of manufacturing milk have experienced for the past months a loss of income as a result of amendments to the dairy policy, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Richmond (Mr. Beaudoin):

That the Standing Committee on Agriculture be asked to consider immediately the dairy policy of the government and report to the House as of March 15, to enable the Minister of Agriculture to make the necessary amendments to the dairy policy on the basis of demands from milk producers.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AGRICULTURE
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MILK POLICY TO FAVOUR PRODUCER-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order. The House has heard the motion of the hon. member. Under the provisions of Standing Order 43, this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there such a consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AGRICULTURE
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MILK POLICY TO FAVOUR PRODUCER-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AGRICULTURE
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MILK POLICY TO FAVOUR PRODUCER-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AGRICULTURE
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MILK POLICY TO FAVOUR PRODUCER-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimous consent, the motion therefore cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AGRICULTURE
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MILK POLICY TO FAVOUR PRODUCER-MOTION UNDER S O. 43
Permalink

SUPPLY AND SERVICES

SUGGESTION INFORMATION BE OBTAINED CONCERNING

SC

Léonel Beaudoin

Social Credit

Mr. Leonel Beaudoin (Richmond):

Mr. Speaker, under the provisions of Standing Order 43, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to discuss a very urgent and important matter.

In view of the serious financial difficulties of the Lockheed Aircraft Company with which the government of Canada is negotiating following the decision to buy 18 Orion aircraft for nearly $1 billion, and since this American aeronautical company has been shaken up by great scandals over bribes offered to politicians from various countries to obtain contracts, a situation which can paralyze the company fairly soon and create prejudices for the

government of Canada, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Champlain (Mr. Matte):

That this House immediately discuss the schedule of payments under the Canadian contract as well as the next negotiations of the government with Lockheed Aircraft Company concerning the questions being asked on the integrity and viability of this company, to encourage the government of Canada to be very careful and reserved so that they do not bear the consequences of the still greater difficulties this American company could have soon.

Topic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Subtopic:   SUGGESTION INFORMATION BE OBTAINED CONCERNING
Sub-subtopic:   LOCKHEED TO AVOID CONTRACT DIFFICULTIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please. The House has heard the terms of the motion of the hon. member. Pursuant to Standing Order 43, this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Subtopic:   SUGGESTION INFORMATION BE OBTAINED CONCERNING
Sub-subtopic:   LOCKHEED TO AVOID CONTRACT DIFFICULTIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Subtopic:   SUGGESTION INFORMATION BE OBTAINED CONCERNING
Sub-subtopic:   LOCKHEED TO AVOID CONTRACT DIFFICULTIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Subtopic:   SUGGESTION INFORMATION BE OBTAINED CONCERNING
Sub-subtopic:   LOCKHEED TO AVOID CONTRACT DIFFICULTIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

There not being unanimous consent, the motion cannot be put.

Topic:   SUPPLY AND SERVICES
Subtopic:   SUGGESTION INFORMATION BE OBTAINED CONCERNING
Sub-subtopic:   LOCKHEED TO AVOID CONTRACT DIFFICULTIES-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

ORAL QUESTION PERIOD

ANTI-INFLATION BOARD REQUEST FOR APPEAL PROCEDURE WHICH WOULD NOT NECESSITATE INDICATION OF UNWILLINGNESS TO COMPLY WITH BOARD ORDER

PC

Robert Lorne Stanfield (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Progressive Conservative

Hon. Robert L. Stanfield (Leader of the Opposition):

Mr. Speaker, I have a question for the Prime Minister arising out of information given in the House yesterday by the Minister of Finance to the effect that it is the intention of the Anti-Inflation Board to refer cases to the administrator and hence open up the appeals procedure only in those instances where a party to a settlement or an agreement has indicated an intention not to comply with the ruling of the Anti-Inflation Board. Is the Prime Minister prepared to review this rather perverse situation, which means that no appeal from the Anti-Inflation Board is available except to those who are prepared to act in defiance of the Board? Is the Prime Minister prepared to review this so that appeals will be open to those seeking appeals without requiring defiance of the board?

Topic:   ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
Subtopic:   ANTI-INFLATION BOARD REQUEST FOR APPEAL PROCEDURE WHICH WOULD NOT NECESSITATE INDICATION OF UNWILLINGNESS TO COMPLY WITH BOARD ORDER
Permalink
LIB

Pierre Elliott Trudeau (Prime Minister)

Liberal

Right Hon. P. E. Trudeau (Prime Minister):

Mr. Speaker, I will have to take notice of the question. I do not have a copy of Hansard here. I was not here when the minister made his statement yesterday. I will have to increase my understanding of this matter before answering the question.

February 17, 1976

Oral Questions

Topic:   ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
Subtopic:   ANTI-INFLATION BOARD REQUEST FOR APPEAL PROCEDURE WHICH WOULD NOT NECESSITATE INDICATION OF UNWILLINGNESS TO COMPLY WITH BOARD ORDER
Permalink
PC

Robert Lorne Stanfield (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Stanfield:

Well, as a former minister of justice and a man who has written with considerable passion on the subject of equality before the law and due process of law, what is the understanding of the Prime Minister now as to the appeal procedure with regard to the anti-inflation program? Is an appeal open, or is it circumscribed, as the Minister of Finance seemed to suggest yesterday?

Topic:   ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
Subtopic:   ANTI-INFLATION BOARD REQUEST FOR APPEAL PROCEDURE WHICH WOULD NOT NECESSITATE INDICATION OF UNWILLINGNESS TO COMPLY WITH BOARD ORDER
Permalink
LIB

Pierre Elliott Trudeau (Prime Minister)

Liberal

Mr. Trudeau:

When I was minister of justice this law had not been passed, and I would have to take notice of the question.

Topic:   ORAL QUESTION PERIOD
Subtopic:   ANTI-INFLATION BOARD REQUEST FOR APPEAL PROCEDURE WHICH WOULD NOT NECESSITATE INDICATION OF UNWILLINGNESS TO COMPLY WITH BOARD ORDER
Permalink

February 17, 1976