June 27, 1975

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

PUBLIC SERVICE

PC

Walter David Baker (Deputy House Leader of the Official Opposition; Progressive Conservative Party Deputy House Leader)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Walter Baker (Grenville-Carleton):

I rise to ask leave to present a motion of urgent and pressing necessity under the provisions of Standing Order 43 arising out of the suspension for three months, without pay, of Arthur Stewart from the Department of Supply and Services, particularly in view of the fact that Mr. Stewart is a public service union leader and his comments may have been made in that capacity and are worthy of investigation in an open and public manner. I move, seconded by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre (Mr. Knowles):

That the suspension of Mr. Arthur Stewart from the Department of Supply and Services be removed and that he be restored forthwith to his office within the department with all the rights and privileges thereof pending the report hereafter referred to and, further, that his comments on the operations of the department be referred to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts for review and report.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE STUDY AND REPORT ON THE SUSPENSION OF MR. ARTHUR STEWART-MOTION UNDER S.O.
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Hear, hear!

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE STUDY AND REPORT ON THE SUSPENSION OF MR. ARTHUR STEWART-MOTION UNDER S.O.
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

The motion being presented under Standing Order 43 it requires unanimous consent. Is there such consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE STUDY AND REPORT ON THE SUSPENSION OF MR. ARTHUR STEWART-MOTION UNDER S.O.
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE STUDY AND REPORT ON THE SUSPENSION OF MR. ARTHUR STEWART-MOTION UNDER S.O.
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   PUBLIC SERVICE
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR COMMITTEE STUDY AND REPORT ON THE SUSPENSION OF MR. ARTHUR STEWART-MOTION UNDER S.O.
Permalink

EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

NDP

Stuart Malcolm Leggatt

New Democratic Party

Mr. Stuart Leggatt (New Westminster):

Mr. Speaker, I, too, rise under the terms of Standing Order 43 on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity. In view of the recent report that South Korea has intensified its alert, and in view of the fact that a North Korean general recently warned that war may break out at any moment, and mindful of yesterday's report that President Park Chung Hee has ordered his defence development agency to begin research on nuclear weapons to develop its own nuclear capacity independent of United States nuclear protection, I would move, seconded by the hon. member for Nanaimo-

Cowichan-The Islands (Mr. Douglas)-I am sorry: by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre (Mr. Knowles)-

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
PC

Gerald William Baldwin (Official Opposition House Leader; Progressive Conservative Party House Leader)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Baldwin:

One is as bad as the other!

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
NDP

Stuart Malcolm Leggatt

New Democratic Party

Mr. Leggatt:

I would move:

That the Secretary of State for External Affairs immediately withdraw the proposal for the sale of a nuclear reactor to South Korea in view of the growing crisis in the area.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Pursuant to Standing Order 43 the motion requires unanimous consent. Does the House give unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF SALE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREA-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43

SC

Joseph Adrien Henri Lambert

Social Credit

Mr. Adrien Lambert (Bellechasse):

Mr. Speaker, under Standing Order 43, I ask the unanimous consent of the House to introduce a motion on an important matter of urgent necessity.

Considering that under Standing Order 2(3) the House does not sit on June 24 and July 1 and that when those days fall on a Tuesday hon. members have to be in the House on Monday, the eve of those holidays, preventing them to attend festivities in their constituency, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Rimouski (Mr. Allard):

That the House approve an amendment to Standing Order 2(3) by adding the following:

When the holidays of June 24 and July 1 fall on a Tuesday, the

House will not sit on June 23 and 30.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order. The House has heard the motion of the hon. member. Under Standing Order 43, this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there such a consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimous consent, so the motion cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink
LIB

James Alexander Jerome (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Order. On the motion put by the hon. member for Bellechasse (Mr. Lambert), I understand there were some discussions. I was listening to see whether or not there was unanimous consent and I thought I

June 27, 1975

Transport

heard some noes. However, they were not very distinct so I wonder whether I might put the question again. [Translation]

The motion moved by the hon. member for Bellechasse (Mr. Lambert) pursuant to Standing Order 43 requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   REQUESTED MODIFICATION OF STANDING ORDERS CONCERNING JUNE 24 AND JULY 1 HOLIDAYS-MOTION UNDER S.O. 43
Permalink

June 27, 1975