March 22, 1974

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW ACT

LIB

Alastair William Gillespie (Minister of Industry, Trade and Commerce)

Liberal

Hon. Alastair Gillespie (Minister of Industry, Trade and Commerce):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 41(2) I should like to table in both official languages copies of the foreign investment review guidelines concerning real estate businesses.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW ACT
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF GUIDELINES CONCERNING REAL ESTATE BUSINESSES
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Introduction of bills. First reading of Senate public bills. Government notices of motions. Oral questions.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW ACT
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF GUIDELINES CONCERNING REAL ESTATE BUSINESSES
Permalink
PC

John George Diefenbaker

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Diefenbaker:

Mr. Speaker, I wanted to move a motion. Apparently it was not brought to the attention of the Chair. I would ask the House to grant leave because it is a matter of extraordinary importance to western Canada.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW ACT
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF GUIDELINES CONCERNING REAL ESTATE BUSINESSES
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Perhaps we might revert to motions for the purpose of allowing the right hon. member for Prince Albert to propose his motion.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW ACT
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF GUIDELINES CONCERNING REAL ESTATE BUSINESSES
Permalink

TRANSPORT

PC

John George Diefenbaker

Progressive Conservative

Right Hon. J. G. Diefenbaker (Prince Albert):

Mr. Speaker, under the provisions of Standing Order 43, by leave of the House I would move, seconded by the hon. member for Winnipeg South Centre (Mr. McKenzie):

That this House condemns as indefensible the action of the Canadian National Railways in totally or partially closing 21 of the 41 railway subdivisions in Saskatchewan for freight under the grain block loading system and for other carload traffic for an indefinite period at a time when the shipment of grain to the major markets is of imperative importance, and the action taken will result in serious and detrimental consequences to the farming population of the province of Saskatchewan in particular as well as to the national economy.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   CLOSING BY CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF CERTAIN SASKATCHEWAN SUBDIVISIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The House has heard the motion proposed by the right hon. member for Prince Albert under the terms of Standing Order 43. It requires unanimity. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   CLOSING BY CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF CERTAIN SASKATCHEWAN SUBDIVISIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   CLOSING BY CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF CERTAIN SASKATCHEWAN SUBDIVISIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   CLOSING BY CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF CERTAIN SASKATCHEWAN SUBDIVISIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimity. The motion cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   CLOSING BY CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF CERTAIN SASKATCHEWAN SUBDIVISIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

SOCIAL SECURITY

SC

Henry P. Latulippe

Social Credit

Mr. Henry Latulippe (Compton):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 43, I ask the unanimous consent of the House to discuss a very urgent and important question.

I move, seconded by the hon. member for Champlain (Mr. Matte):

That this House ask the government to consider the possibility of raising the old age security pensions to $200 a month for a person of 60 and his spouse under 60, and to abolish the supplement now subject to a needs test.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SOCIAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO INCREASE OLD AGE PENSIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The House has heard the motion of the hon. member. Under Standing Order 43, this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there such consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SOCIAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO INCREASE OLD AGE PENSIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SOCIAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO INCREASE OLD AGE PENSIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SOCIAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO INCREASE OLD AGE PENSIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimous consent; therefore, the motion cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   SOCIAL SECURITY
Sub-subtopic:   PROPOSAL TO INCREASE OLD AGE PENSIONS-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

ORAL QUESTION PERIOD

VETERANS LAND ACT

March 22, 1974