January 4, 1974

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

INDUSTRY

LIB

Alastair William Gillespie (Minister of Industry, Trade and Commerce)

Liberal

Hon. Alastair Gillespie (Minister of Industry, Trade and Commerce):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 41(2) I wish to table in both official languages copies of two reports, the Textile and Clothing Board report respecting cotton yarns and the Textile and Clothing Board report respecting men's and boys' shirts.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING BOARD'S REPORTS ON COTTON YARNS AND MEN'S AND BOYS' SHIRTS
Permalink
NDP

Frank Howard

New Democratic Party

Mr. Howard:

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order relating to the procedure under motions and the responses or lack of them of the Minister of Transport yesterday in the House about the movement of crude oil from the port of Vancouver to the east coast. In response to one question yesterday the minister said that perhaps we could find another opportunity to discuss this, and so on. It would seem to me, because of the confusion that exists respecting government policy and who is right-

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING BOARD'S REPORTS ON COTTON YARNS AND MEN'S AND BOYS' SHIRTS
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please. Is the hon. member rising on a point of order or is he rising to propose a motion? I think he should indicate to the Chair under what Standing Order he is now seeking the floor.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING BOARD'S REPORTS ON COTTON YARNS AND MEN'S AND BOYS' SHIRTS
Permalink
NDP

Frank Howard

New Democratic Party

Mr. Howard:

I am sorry, Mr. Speaker. At the outset I did say I was rising on a point of order with regard to the procedure under motions. I do not want to move a motion. My point of order is the obvious disdain of the Minister of Transport (Mr. Marchand) for the House in refusing to state clearly here and to the people of Canada, particularly in Vancouver, what is happening with regard to the authority of his department over ships moving crude oil out of Vancouver and the potential danger that arises therefrom. That is the point of order.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING BOARD'S REPORTS ON COTTON YARNS AND MEN'S AND BOYS' SHIRTS
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

That is hardly a point of order. It may be a point of disorder. I am not sure how to qualify it, but I would doubt that we should have a debate at this time on the point raised by the hon. member.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   INDUSTRY
Sub-subtopic:   TABLING OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING BOARD'S REPORTS ON COTTON YARNS AND MEN'S AND BOYS' SHIRTS
Permalink

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE

PC

Kenneth Earl Hurlburt

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Ken Hurlburt (Lethbridge):

Mr. Speaker, I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43 on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity, namely, the widespread resentment of the majority of Canadians about the unemployment insurance rip-off whereby unemployment insurance benefits induce people not to search for work opportunities. I move, seconded by the hon. member for Moose Jaw (Mr. Neil):

That this matter be referred to the Standing Committee on Manpower and Immigration in order to consider the feasibility of a work incentive, such as an increase in the personal exemptions of $100 per month for every month a person is employed in excess of six months during the year.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   ALLEGED LACK OF INDUCEMENT TO RECIPIENTS TO SEEK WORK-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   ALLEGED LACK OF INDUCEMENT TO RECIPIENTS TO SEEK WORK-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   ALLEGED LACK OF INDUCEMENT TO RECIPIENTS TO SEEK WORK-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   ALLEGED LACK OF INDUCEMENT TO RECIPIENTS TO SEEK WORK-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimous consent.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   ALLEGED LACK OF INDUCEMENT TO RECIPIENTS TO SEEK WORK-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

TRANSPORT

SC

Eudore Allard

Social Credit

Mr. Eudore Allard (Rimouski):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 43, I seek the unanimous consent of the House to move a motion concerning a matter of urgent and pressing necessity.

The number of railway accidents throughout Canada having considerably increased, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Portneuf (Mr. Godin):

That the House take this opportunity to appoint a royal commission on the administration of railways throughout Canada and suggest means to urgently remedy the consequences of this deplorable deterioration in this service of prime necessity and national interest.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ROYAL COMMISSION ON RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The House has heard the motion of the hon. member. Under Standing Order 43, this motion requires the unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ROYAL COMMISSION ON RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ROYAL COMMISSION ON RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

January 4, 1974

Oral Questions

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ROYAL COMMISSION ON RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There is no unanimous consent; therefore, the motion cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   TRANSPORT
Sub-subtopic:   REQUEST FOR ROYAL COMMISSION ON RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

CLASS ACTIONS BILL

January 4, 1974