April 16, 1973

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

AIRPORTS

NDP

John Paul Harney

New Democratic Party

Mr. John Harney (Scarborough West):

Mr. Speaker, I rise under the provisions of Standing Order 43 on a matter of urgent and pressing necessity. In view of the fact it was announced over two months ago that there would be an inquiry into the expropriations in connection with the second Toronto international airport, and in view of the fact that the expropriations will take place before this House reconvenes in May, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Toronto-Lakeshore (Mr. Grier):

That this House instruct the Minister of Transport to announce before the House rises on Wednesday both the membership and the terms of reference of the Commission of Inquiry to look into the planning and transportation needs of the Toronto region in relation to the construction of the proposed international airport in Pickering.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIRPORTS
Sub-subtopic:   PICKERING TOWNSHIP SITE-COMMISSION OF INQUIRY- REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The motion requires unanimous consent under the terms of Standing Order 43. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIRPORTS
Sub-subtopic:   PICKERING TOWNSHIP SITE-COMMISSION OF INQUIRY- REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIRPORTS
Sub-subtopic:   PICKERING TOWNSHIP SITE-COMMISSION OF INQUIRY- REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIRPORTS
Sub-subtopic:   PICKERING TOWNSHIP SITE-COMMISSION OF INQUIRY- REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimity.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   AIRPORTS
Sub-subtopic:   PICKERING TOWNSHIP SITE-COMMISSION OF INQUIRY- REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE

SC

Gérard Laprise

Social Credit

Mr. Gerard Laprise (Abitibi):

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 43, I solicit the unanimous consent of the House to present a motion on a matter or urgent and pressing necessity for applicants for unemployment insurance benefits.

Considering that Section 106 of the Unemployment Insurance Act has not been implemented as promised when the act was considered in 1971 and that officials of the commission seek to trip up applicants instead of attempting to assist them to return to the labour market, I move, seconded by the hon. member for Rimouski (Mr. Allard):

That the Minister of Manpower and Immigration take necessary measures for implementation of Section 106 of the Unemployment Insurance Act as early as possible.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   APPLICATION OF SECTION 106 OF ACT-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The House has heard the hon. member's motion. Under Standing Order 43, the motion requires unanimous consent of the House. Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   APPLICATION OF SECTION 106 OF ACT-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Yes.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   APPLICATION OF SECTION 106 OF ACT-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   APPLICATION OF SECTION 106 OF ACT-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There does not seem to be unanimity and the motion therefore cannot be put.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Sub-subtopic:   APPLICATION OF SECTION 106 OF ACT-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

JUDGES ACT

LIB

Otto Emil Lang (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada; Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board)

Liberal

Hon. Otto E. Lang (Minister of Justice) moved

for leave to introduce Bill C-177, to amend the Judges Act.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   JUDGES ACT
Sub-subtopic:   PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL JUDGES FOR CERTAIN COURTS
Permalink

Motion agreed to, bill read the first time and ordered to be printed.


QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER


(Questions answered orally are indicated by an asterisk.)


PC

Mr. Blenkarn

Progressive Conservative

1. What grants were made under Opportunity for Youth Program during 1972 to groups in the constituency of Peel South?

2. What are the names and addresses of each group and the names and addresses of each sponsor of each group that received approved grants in 1972?

3. What are the names and addresses of each group and the sponsor of each group that made application for Opportunity for Youth grant programs during 1972 that did not receive any assistance under this program?

4. What is the evaluation on the grants that were in fact made by the Minister's office in connection with the operation of those grants and the work supposedly done by the persons involved with these grants during 1972 in the constituency of Peel South?

5. Who made the evaluation for the grants during 1972 in the constituency of Peel South?

April 16, 1973

Order Paper Questions

6. Has the Minister any audited statements of the grants made in the constituency of Peel South during 1972 and are audited statements of these grants now available?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUTH GRANTS IN PEEL SOUTH CONSTITUENCY, 1972
Permalink
LIB

James Hugh Faulkner (Secretary of State of Canada)

Liberal

Hon. James Hugh Faulkner (Secretary of State):

1. A

list of all projects funded under the 1972 Opportunities for Youth Program has been completed. Projects are classified by province and in alphabetical order of the towns and cities in which the projects were carried out, not by constituency. Information includes the project title and number, a short description of the project's activities, amount of the grant, number of participants and the name and address of the project representative. This 421 page listing can be obtained from the Secretary of State Department.

2. Projects funded under the 1972 Opportunities for Youth Program were not required to have sponsors.

3. No tabulated records exist for projects which were not selected for funding under the Opportunities for Youth Program during 1972.

4 and 5. All groups receiving a grant from the Opportunities for Youth Program in 1972 were required to submit an evaluation of their own projects at the end of the summer. All project evaluations were reviewed by officials in the Department of the Secretary of State but are not classified according to constituency.

6. Opportunities for Youth does not maintain statistics or information according to constituency. In 1972, the Audit Services Bureau of the Department of Supply and Services did audits on all Opportunities for Youth projects which received grants in amounts exceeding $15,000 and also on a random sample of the remaining projects. In all, approximately 700 audits were completed. The information contained in the audits is of a private and confidential nature and is not to be regarded as public or official.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER
Sub-subtopic:   OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUTH GRANTS IN PEEL SOUTH CONSTITUENCY, 1972
Permalink

April 16, 1973