January 30, 1973

?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FISHERIES
Sub-subtopic:   HERRING-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FISHERIES
Sub-subtopic:   HERRING-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The motion cannot be put. The hon. member for Hamilton Mountain.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FISHERIES
Sub-subtopic:   HERRING-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NDP

Frank Howard

New Democratic Party

Mr. Howard:

Did the Minister of the Environment say no to that?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FISHERIES
Sub-subtopic:   HERRING-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please. The hon. member for Hamilton Mountain.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   FISHERIES
Sub-subtopic:   HERRING-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

CITIZENSHIP

PC

Duncan M. Beattie

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Duncan M. Beattie (Hamilton Mountain):

Mr. Speaker, I ask leave of the House to propose a motion under Standing Order 43. At the present time there are many long-time residents of Canada eligible for old age or other pensions who are not Canadian citizens. Before obtaining the right to vote they must first take out Canadian citizen-

January 30, 1973

ship and the $10 fee could impose a financial hardship. Therefore I move, seconded by the hon. member for Bur-naby-Richmond-Delta (Mr. Reynolds):

That the question whether persons reaching age 65 years or over, or who are disabled or war veterans, and who are not Canadian citizens but are otherwise qualified for old age security or other social assistance be exempt from the $10 citizenship fee, be referred to the Standing Committee on Health, Welfare and Social Affairs.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Is there unanimous consent?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

No.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

There is not unanimous consent.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
PC

Steve Eugene Paproski

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Paproski:

A question of privilege, Mr. Speaker.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NDP

Thomas Speakman Barnett

New Democratic Party

Mr. Barnett:

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, are we to wait for the statement by the Minister of the Environment-

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
PC

Steve Eugene Paproski

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Paproski:

A question of privilege, Mr. Speaker.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please. Would the hon. member for Comox-Alberni resume his seat? I believe the hon. member for Edmonton Centre seeks the floor on a question of privilege. He should be given priority.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
PC

Steve Eugene Paproski

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Paproski:

Mr. Speaker, I should like to call to the attention of the Prime Minister the fact that no western members have been invited to the Bishop Laval commemorative stamp issuing ceremonies tomorrow in Quebec City. Is he still mad at us?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

Order, please. The hon. member knows that he cannot raise a question of privilege in this way. It is a pure abuse of the rules. The hon. member knows that he has to give the required notice, which of course he did not give. This is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a question of privilege and it cannot be raised at this time.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NDP

Thomas Speakman Barnett

New Democratic Party

Mr. Barnett:

Mr. Speaker, my point of order relates to the statement made by the Minister of Transport yesterday to the effect that we would get a report today on the oil spill off the British Columbia coast from the Minister of the Environment. I raise this point at this time because so far I have not seen the Minister of the Environment rising in his place.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NDP

Stanley Howard Knowles (N.D.P. House Leader)

New Democratic Party

Mr. Knowles (Winnipeg North Centre):

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. A few minutes ago the Minister of Transport tabled a statement which became the subject of comment by those who responded to the statement on motions made by the Minister of Public Works. In order that those who read the record might have everything before them, would it not be a good idea for that statement to be appended to today's Hansard? I refer to the statement tabled by the Minister of Transport.

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink
NONE

Lucien Lamoureux (Speaker of the House of Commons)

No affiliation

Mr. Speaker:

The hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre has made a suggestion. Is this agreed?

Topic:   ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS
Subtopic:   CITIZENSHIP
Sub-subtopic:   SUGGESTED EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FROM FEE-REQUEST FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO MOVE MOTION
Permalink

January 30, 1973