March 22, 1957

CANADA MINIMUM WAGE ACT

ESTABLISHMENT OF MINIMUM RATE OF WAGES FOR EMPLOYEES

CCF

Stanley Howard Knowles (Whip of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation)

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Stanley Knowles (Winnipeg North Centre) moved

the first reading of Bill No. 281, to provide for minimum wages for employees.

Topic:   CANADA MINIMUM WAGE ACT
Subtopic:   ESTABLISHMENT OF MINIMUM RATE OF WAGES FOR EMPLOYEES
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Explain.

Topic:   CANADA MINIMUM WAGE ACT
Subtopic:   ESTABLISHMENT OF MINIMUM RATE OF WAGES FOR EMPLOYEES
Permalink
CCF

Stanley Howard Knowles (Whip of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation)

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Knowles:

The purpose of this bill is to establish $1 an hour as a minimum rate of wages for all employees in Canada who come under federal labour jurisdiction. The bill provides that its terms do not affect any employee whose rate of wages is higher than $1 an hour, but any rate less favourable would be superseded by this legislation.

Motion agreed to and bill read the first time.

Topic:   CANADA MINIMUM WAGE ACT
Subtopic:   ESTABLISHMENT OF MINIMUM RATE OF WAGES FOR EMPLOYEES
Permalink

NEW TITLE OF DUKE OF EDINBURGH IN OPENING PRAYER


On the orders of the day:


LIB

Walter Edward Harris (Minister of Finance and Receiver General; Leader of the Government in the House of Commons; Liberal Party House Leader)

Liberal

Hon. W. E. Harris (Minister of Finance):

Mr. Speaker, on February 28 the hon. member for Fort William (Mr. Mclvor) asked whether a change would be made in one of the prayers which the Speaker reads at the opening of each sitting in order that His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh might be referred to by his proper title.

Inquiries were made in this regard, and I am now advised that it would appear to be necessary to substitute the words "The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh" for the words "Philip, Duke of Edinburgh" in the prayer.

Topic:   NEW TITLE OF DUKE OF EDINBURGH IN OPENING PRAYER
Permalink
LIB

Louis-René Beaudoin (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

May I ask the house if it is its pleasure to make an alteration in the prayer such as that which has been suggested by the Minister of Finance?

Topic:   NEW TITLE OF DUKE OF EDINBURGH IN OPENING PRAYER
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Agreed.

Topic:   NEW TITLE OF DUKE OF EDINBURGH IN OPENING PRAYER
Permalink

REQUEST FOR ANSWER TO QUESTION ON ORDER PAPER


On the orders of the day:


PC

Hayden Stanton

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Hayden Stanton (Leeds):

Mr. Speaker, I would like to direct a question to the Minister of Justice. When may I expect

from the minister an answer to my question on the order paper of February 12?

Topic:   REQUEST FOR ANSWER TO QUESTION ON ORDER PAPER
Permalink
LIB

Stuart Sinclair Garson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada)

Liberal

Hon. Stuart S. Garson (Minister of Justice):

I must say I was not aware that the hon. member had a question on the order paper of that date, but I will look it up.

Topic:   REQUEST FOR ANSWER TO QUESTION ON ORDER PAPER
Permalink

EXTERNAL AFFAIRS


On the orders of the day:


PC

Howard Charles Green

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Howard C. Green (Vancouver-Quadra):

Can the Secretary of State for External Affairs answer the question today concerning the functions of the United Nations emergency force in the Gaza strip?

Topic:   REQUEST FOR ANSWER TO QUESTION ON ORDER PAPER
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON REPORTED WITHDRAWAL OF UNEF TO DEMARCATION LINE
Permalink
LIB

Lester Bowles Pearson (Secretary of State for External Affairs)

Liberal

Hon. L. B. Pearson (Secrefary of Siate for External Affairs):

Mr. Speaker, in answer to my hon. friend's question I should like to make the following statement. The legal rights of Egypt in the administration of the Gaza strip derive from the armistice agreement between Egypt and Israel signed in 1949 and confirmed by the United Nations. If these legal rights are ignored or rejected, then the armistice agreement is violated. But the United Nations assembly has affirmed by more than one resolution, including that of February 2 which was carried unanimously, that the armistice provisions, all of them, should be scrupulously observed.

The responsibilities and functions of the United Nations in the Gaza strip come from assembly resolutions and are reinforced by the practical necessities of the situation. These responsibilities and functions in our opinion should be accepted by Egypt, which should fully co-operate with the United Nations in their discharge. If Egypt is unwilling to co-operate in this way, then the United Nations' task in Gaza becomes impossible and the matter in our opinion should be referred at once to the United Nations assembly.

Our position, Mr. Speaker, which has been stated more than once in New York and in this house, is that the United Nations should be associated to the maximum possible extent in the administration of the Gaza strip. I regret that this was not made clear and definite in a resolution of the United Nations assembly which would have specified the arrangements to follow the withdrawal of

Inquiries of the Ministry Israeli forces. Why that was not done, Mr. Speaker, I attempted to explain a week ago today. It should be recalled also that the United Nations already accepts full responsibility for more than 200,000 Arab refugees in Gaza.

The problem then, as I see it, is to find an acceptable balance in the administration of Gaza between the practical position which the United Nations must take and the legal position of Egypt under the armistice agreement. Any such "suitable balance" in particular must give the United Nations that control of internal security in the Gaza strip necessary to enable it to carry out effectively its operations and responsibilities on the demarcation line. So far as the Canadian government is concerned, UNEF could not be expected to discharge effectively its duty of preventing raids and incursions and maintain peaceful conditions along that line if it were not in a position to carry out observations or investigations and to exercise necessary control in the strip itself. A satisfactory agreement to this effect is a fundamental prerequisite of the effective continuance of UNEF's role on the demarcation line. If no such agreement is made and kept, there will not only be renewed trouble between Israel and Egypt but the continued operation of UNEF will be prejudiced. Certainly it would be difficult for Canada to continue to participate in the force under conditions-and we hope those conditions will not materialize -in which it would not be able to discharge satisfactorily the responsibilities given to it by the United Nations assembly. We have made this position clear more than once to the secretary general and to the advisory committee in New York as recently as last week.

The secretary general is at the moment engaged in very important discussions with the governments immediately concerned. As yet we have had only a preliminary report concerning the discussions which are now going on in Cairo, but that report has been enough to cause us to question the accuracy of certain Cairo press messages about these talks.

I hope, Mr. Speaker, and I am sure the house hopes, that these discussions will clear up the difficulties that face the United Nations in this area. Otherwise the results will be serious for United Nations' action there and perhaps even for peace between the conflicting states. At the conclusion of his talk the secretary general will report to the committee of seven, of which Canada is a member, which will no doubt then consider in the light of that report whether a meeting of the full assembly is required.

Topic:   REQUEST FOR ANSWER TO QUESTION ON ORDER PAPER
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON REPORTED WITHDRAWAL OF UNEF TO DEMARCATION LINE
Permalink
PC

Howard Charles Green

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Green:

Are we to take it that the situation at the present time is that the emergency

force troops are being deployed along the demarcation line rather than being centred in Gaza itself?

Topic:   REQUEST FOR ANSWER TO QUESTION ON ORDER PAPER
Subtopic:   EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON REPORTED WITHDRAWAL OF UNEF TO DEMARCATION LINE
Permalink

March 22, 1957