January 11, 1956

CCF

Major James William Coldwell

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Coldwell:

I do, yes. May I read it?

I ask leave, seconded by the hon. member for Assiniboia (Mr. Argue), to move the adjournment of the house under standing order 26 for the purpose of discussing a definite matter of urgent public importance, namely the need for immediate action to provide cash advances on farm-stored grain to alleviate the serious financial crisis now confronting western farmers and the entire economy of the prairie provinces. I make this motion because I believe that this is the right time to move it.

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
LIB

Louis-René Beaudoin (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Would the hon. member be good enough to comment further on his contention that this is the right place to move this motion?

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
CCF

Major James William Coldwell

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Coldwell:

Under standing order 26 a member is entitled to move the adjournment of the debate for the consideration of an urgent matter of public importance. The time to move that is after starred questions on Wednesday. There were no starred questions on the order paper today, and there being no starred questions on the order paper they could not be called. Hence if they could not be called that should not preclude a member

from rising in his place and making an appropriate motion at the appropriate time. I submit that the fact that there were no starred questions does not take away from an hon. member the right to move a motion such as 1 have already moved.

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
LIB

Louis-René Beaudoin (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

The reason the words "after starred questions on Wednesday" were added to this standing order was that the house wanted to make sure that starred questions would be disposed of on that particular day. It should be understood that a motion of this kind, being one of urgency, must be made at the very first opportunity. This motion is such as to stop discussion on any other matter. Therefore I think it should have been moved after routine business had been concluded, even on a day like today when there are no starred questions.

It is quite evident why there are no starred questions today. Under another standing order 48 hours' notice must be given, and the house met only yesterday. We passed a motion yesterday afternoon to the effect that today we would take as the first order of business the debate on the address in reply to the speech from the throne. We have now reached the stage where an ordinary adjournment motion could be made, a motion such as a motion to adjourn the house. Such a motion is non-debatable.

The hon. member for Rosetown-Biggar (Mr. Coldwell), thinking that standing order 26 was the one on which he could depend at this juncture, has moved this particular motion. If the hon. member and I do not agree on what I have said so far I think he will agree with me as to this further point. Whenever the speech from the throne is the first order of business no other motion to discuss a matter of urgent public importance should be entertained.

The urgency of debate is something that has to be considered. The acting leader of the house has indicated by his announcement of the order that tomorrow the matter referred to in this motion could be discussed. In my experience it has never happened in the house that while the speech from the throne was being currently debated a motion for the purpose of discussing a definite matter of urgent public importance under the new standing order 26 was agreed to.

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
CCF

Stanley Howard Knowles (Whip of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation)

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Stanley Knowles (Winnipeg North Centre):

Mr. Speaker, would you permit a comment on this point? First of all, may I suggest that one should be aware of the fact

that under standing order 38 the debate on the address in reply to the speech from the throne, on any day when it takes place, is placed ahead of all other matters, including starred questions. Therefore I feel that if my leader had attempted earlier today to move the adjournment of the house he could have been told quite properly that he would have to wait until all starred questions-this being Wednesday-had been disposed of, and that he would not get a chance at starred questions until after the house had finished what debate it wished to have on the address in reply to the speech from the throne.

I can say that my leader certainly gave consideration to attempting to move this motion earlier, but he felt that he would be out of order and therefore he preferred to wait until the time provided for in the rules.

As to the point as to whether or not a motion of this kind should be allowed when the debate on the address or the budget is going on, I suggest that both of those debates are general debates. There are occasions when hon. members who have taken part in those debates are interested also in the urgency of matters such as this, and there really is no reason why the fact that these other debates are taking place should preclude their taking part in a discussion which they feel is on a matter of urgent public importance.

I can recall that frequently Your Honour and your predecessors have suggested when an attempt like this has been made that consideration had to be given to the urgency of the debate. In other words you had to consider whether the question was of sufficient urgency to set aside what had been planned already for the house at that particular time. At this particular time the plan seems to be for the house to adjourn and the members to go home. By presenting this motion we are not proposing the setting aside of any other important matter. We propose this instead of going home. I feel that on all counts, the way in which the rules are set up, on the score of importance and on the score that it does not interfere with the discussion of anything else, this motion should be allowed for discussion for such time as the house wishes to give to it between now and six o'clock.

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
LIB

Louis-René Beaudoin (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

I must tell the hon. gentleman that when he says that in the past my predecessors, at least two of them, or I,

Grain-Proposed Cash Advances decided that there was no urgency of debate on the basis that we should not put aside the matters which had been specified to be debated on a particular day, he has, I agree, a point. It was in that light that very often decisions were made, namely that the motion would not be allowed, and that the business which had been appointed for that day should not be put aside, it being more urgent to debate other matters than the one proposed in the motion to adjourn the house.

I am not going to try to split hairs. It has been indicated by the hon. member and his leader that they have specific reasons for bringing forward this motion at this moment. Were I to agree that the motion has been moved at the right moment, and that it cannot be refused on the ground that matters appointed for today are more urgent, and this obviously because the said matters have already been disposed of and we are now, as he says, preparing to go home; if I were to state it as my opinion that this was a matter of urgent public importance we would have the situation that between four and six o'clock we would be debating this matter, namely the need for immediate action to provide cash advances on farm-stored grain, to alleviate the serious financial crisis now confronting western farmers and the entire economy of the prairie provinces.

For two hours we would be debating this specific subject which, in my view, as it has just been mentioned in the speech from the throne, will certainly be commented upon, discussed and debated at great length by many speakers during the debate on the speech from the throne. What will be my position when I try to administer other rules which tell me that there should not be any repetition of arguments, notwithstanding how much latitude is given in a debate like the speech from the throne debate?

I think the hon. member, for the sake of orderly discussion from now on, should not press the motion at this time, as I feel it is very important that we have an orderly and sufficiently wide discussion in the speech from the throne debate, and as I feel difficulty would be caused to other hon. members generally in discussing the speech from the throne without knowing exactly what to do about the specified matter being brought up today, one which cannot be debated to the satisfaction of all within the two hours that we have at our disposal.

Grain-Proposed Cash Advances Does the hon. member for Rosetown-Biggar (Mr. Coldwell) wish to add something?

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
CCF

Major James William Coldwell

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Coldwell:

Mr. Speaker, I have listened very carefully to what you said latterly. Far be it from me to put into your mind as Speaker of the house the possibility of preventing a wider discussion of this matter in the debate on the speech from the throne. I did not bring the matter forward with that in view. I brought it forward because I had promised my constituents who are wheat growers that I would raise it at the first opportunity, and this is the first opportunity I have had of raising it. But if the allowance

of this debate today would preclude the possibility of discussion of this matter by many members of the house who will not be able to discuss it in the next two hours, I would be the last one in the world to endeavour to interfere or risk interfering with their right to discuss this very important matter. Without prejudice, therefore, I will take your advice.

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink
LIB

Louis-René Beaudoin (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. Speaker:

Therefore I will not receive the motion.

On motion of Mr. St. Laurent the house adjourned at 4.05 p.m.

Dominion-Provincial Relations

Topic:   CASH ADVANCES ON FARM STORAGE
Subtopic:   MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 26
Permalink

APPENDIX

LETTERS AND DRAFT AGREEMENTS RESPECTING FISCAL ARRANGEMENTS AND UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE


Similar letters sent to the premiers of all provinces. The letter to the premier of Quebec was in the French language.


OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER CANADA


Ottawa, January 6, 1956. My dear Premier: At the opening session of our October conference, I put forward certain general ideas which the federal government believed would form a reasonable basis for a revised approach to the question of federal-provincial fiscal arrangements. These ideas were further elaborated in our sessions in camera, with some statistical illustrations of how they might operate. We discussed these suggestions at some length at the conference and the general consensus seemed to be that they were worth careful study. We did not expect, nor did we ask the provincial governments to commit themselves on these principles at the conference, but at the closing session, I invited them to send in further comments or observations after they had had time for further consideration. Since the conference I have received formal communications from four provincial governments and there have been informal exchanges of views with other provinces, both between ministers and officials; all of these have been carefully considered. The federal government is now prepared to make a definite proposal and to recommend to parliament that appropriate legislation be passed along the following lines: 1. The federal government would make unconditional tax equalization payments to the provinces. In brief, these annual equalization payments would bring the combined per capita yield of certain standard taxes applied to the personal income tax field, the corporate tax field and the succession duty field up to the level of the average per capita yield of these taxes in the two provinces which have the highest per capita combined yields in these three fields. These equalization payments would be paid during each fiscal year commencing April 1, 1957, and would be calculated on the basis of the tax and population figures for the preceding taxation year. 2. During the currency of these arrangements, the federal government would also pay to each provincial government each year any amount required to bring the total yield of these standard taxes, plus the equalization payment, up to the highest of: (a) the tax rental paid or available to the provincial government in respect of the year ending March 31, 1957, increased by an amount proportionate to any increase in population of the province, from June 1, 1956 to June 1 of the taxation year in respect of which the equalization payment is made; or (b) in the fiscal year 1958-59, 90 per cent of the standard tax yield plus equalization and stabilization payments, if any, in 195758, and in subsequent years, 90 per cent of the average standard tax yield plus equalization and stabilization payments, if any, in the two preceding years. 3. Where a provincial government undertakes not to impose or permit its municipalities to impose taxes in the personal income tax field, or the corporation tax field or the succession duty field, the federal government would pay to such provincial government each year an amount equal to the yield of the standard tax in that field in that province. 4. Where a provincial government prefers to impose and collect its own taxes in any of these three fields at whatever rates it chooses, the federal government would abate the rate of federal tax in that field in that province by the standard rate. 5. Where a provincial government chooses to impose and collect corporation taxes, other than a general tax on profits, the federal



Dominion-Provincial Relations government in determining the taxable income of a corporation would not allow as an expense provincial corporation taxes on that corporation up to 9 per cent of its taxable income or up to the general rate of corporate income tax levied by the provincial government, whichever is the greater. Where the total provincial corporation taxes paid by a corporation exceed such level, such excess would be allowed as an expense to the corporation. The cost to the federal treasury of allowing such excess as a corporate expense would be deducted from any payments due to the provincial government arising out of these proposals. 6. The standard rates proposed are: (a) On personal incomes, 10 per cent of the federal tax under the Income Tax Act (i.e. excluding the old age security tax); (b) On corporations, 9 per cent of the taxable income deemed to be earned in the province; (c) On successions, 50 per cent of the federal duty. (In calculating equalization payments, it is proposed to average the yield of succession duties over a period of three years.) 7. In calculating equalization payments, stabilization payments or rental payments under numbered paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, the standard rates of personal income tax and succession duty would be adjusted upward or downward each year, if necessary, in order to offset any future changes in either the rates of tax or personal exemptions resulting from future amendments to the Income Tax Act or the Succession Duty Act. We propose that these arrangements be for a period of five years commencing April 1, 1957. These proposals provide revenues to the provinces somewhat greater than those available under the present tax-rental system; they provide for revenues increasing with the growth and expansion of our country; and they guarantee a measure of stability in this sector of provincial revenues more effectively than do the present arrangements. They also make it possible for any provincial government so desiring to secure these revenues in these tax fields without the necessity of imposing and collecting its own taxes. It would, I think, be useful to have our committee of officials meet as early in February as possible to clarify the technical details of these proposals. I would be glad to hear from you in due course. Yours sincerely,


LOUIS S. ST. LAURENT. COMMONS


(Similar letter sent to alt provinces) OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER Ottawa, December 5, 1955. The Honourable Leslie M. Frost, Premier of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario. My dear Premier: My colleagues and I have been considering changes in the draft unemployment assistance agreement proposed by a number of provinces in earlier correspondence and in discussions held with federal officials during the week of October 3rd. We have now approved a revised draft agreement, two copies of which I am enclosing with this letter. In revising the draft agreement, we have sought to meet all the points raised by provincial representatives in so far as they would help to assure to all provinces, with their wide variety of institutions and procedures for providing relief, an equal measure of federal participation. In all cases where changes have been made it will be noted that the revised text offers somewhat more favourable terms to the provinces than was the case in the original draft of last August. No change is contemplated in the formula designed to meet the special situation in Nova Scotia as set forth in my letter to you of August 26th. The attached agreement was drafted in such a manner that it may be given effect from July 1st, 1955, or whatever later date may be preferred by each provincial government. In the event your government decides to enter into an agreement on the basis of this revised draft, would you please arrange to have both the attached copies signed or initialled by your appropriate minister and returned to the Minister of National Health and Welfare for completion on behalf of the federal government and one of the copies will then be returned to you for your records. Before sending the signed or initialled copies to Mr. Martin, paragraph 17 should, of course, be completed to indicate whether you wish the agreement to come into force on July 1st, 1955, or at some later date, and also whether the agreement with your province is to run for a term certain of five years or some lesser period. Following completion of the agreement, the appropriate officers of the federal government will work out with the officials of whatever department you may designate the detailed administrative procedures for the submission of monthly reimbursement claims, beginning with the month in which the agreement takes effect. Federal authority to make the actual reimbursement payments will, of course, have to await the passage of legislation at the next session of parliament beginning January 10th, 1956. Yours sincerely,


LOUIS S. ST. LAURENT.


Drajt agreement as submitted on December 5, 1955 to all provinces except Nova Scotia: Memorandum of Agreement Respecting Unemployment Assistance made this day of 19 . Between: The Government of Canada, hereinafter called "Canada", Of the First Part and The Government of the Province of , hereinafter called , Of the Second Part Whereas Canada and are desirous of entering into an agreement for the purpose of providing assistance to unemployed persons who are in need, and for the sharing of the costs thereof; Now, therefore, this agreement witnesseth that in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree each with the other as follows: 1. In this agreement, unless the contrary intention appears, (a) "province" means the province of "(b) "municipality" means a municipal corporation in the province and includes any city, town or local governmental body established under the authority of the law of the province and authorized to administer assistance to unemployed persons who are in need; (c) "a recipient of mother's allowance" includes (i) a dependent child of a person receiving a mother's allowance if such child is within the age group for whom provision is made under the law of the province that provides for the payment of mothers' allowances; and (iil the husband of a person receiving a mother's allowance if an allowance is being paid on his behalf under the law of the province that provides for the payment of mothers' allowances. Dominion-Provincial Relations (d) "population" means, except in subparagraph Ca) of paragraph 13, the most recent estimate of the population of the province made by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics and published by the Queen's Printer at Ottawa prior to the month to which the reimbursement claim relates; (e) "homes for special care" means nursing homes, hostels for indigent transients, homes for the aged, poor houses, alms houses and hostel facilities provided for the aged within housing projects constructed under the provisions of the National Housing Act; and (f) words in the singular include the plural and words in the plural include the singular, 2. At the first session of Parliament following the execution of this Agreement, Canada shall introduce and recommend the enactment of such legislation as may be required to enable Canada to give effect to this Agreement, and at the first session of the Legislature of the province following the execution of this Agreement shall introduce and recommend the enactment of such legislation as may be required to enable to give effect to this Agreement. 3. shall make all the necessary arrangements for (a) the receipt, by itself or by municipalities, of applications for assistance from unemployed persons in the province, and . (b) the verification of the representations made by applicants and the province shall assume responsibility for the correctness of such representations. 4. shall make available to officials of Canada particulars of (a) the conditions prescribed by or by municipalities under which assistance may be given to persons in need, and (b) the rates of assistance payable. 5. Length of residence shall not be made a condition for the receipt of assistance if (a) the applicant has come from a province whose government has entered into an agreement similar to this respecting unemployment assistance, and (b) such agreement includes a like clause as herein contained in respect of length of residence not being a condition for receipt of assistance. 6. shall deliver to the Minister of National Health and Welfare, at Ottawa, a monthly statement, hereinafter referred to as a reimbursement claim, in such form as'Canada may require, indicating, inter alia, (a) the total number of persons who are unemployed and in need in the province, including their dependents, who have received 26 HOUSE OF Dominion-Provincial Relations assistance during the month to which the reimbursement claim relates, and (b) the total amounts paid to or on behalf of such persons during the month to which the reimbursement claim relates. 7. shall keep a record of the names and addresses of any persons and of the number of their dependents who have received assistance and the particulars of such assistance, which record shall be made available for examination on request by officials of Canada. 8. There shall be excluded from the reimbursement claim any person, together with any payment made to or on behalf of such person, who is (a) an inmate in any institution maintained in whole or in part out of funds appropriated by (i) the Parliament of Canada, (ii) the Legislature of the province, (iii) a municipality, or (iv) a charitable organization; except that there may be included in the reimbursement claim payments made by the province or by a municipality for the upkeep of inmates in homes for special care and the number of persons in respect of whom such payments are made, provided that said inmates are unemployed and in need and the payments claimed do not exceed what an individual might reasonably be expected to pay for accommodation of a comparable kind and quality in the same locality and provided further that said inmates are not such as would normally be cared for in general, acute, chronic or convalescent hospitals, tuberculosis sanatoria, mental institutions, institutions for incurables, orphanages or child welfare institutions; (b) a person in receipt of (i) unemployment benefit under the Unemployment Insurance Act, (ii) a pension under the Old Age Security Act, (iii) assistance under the Old Age Assistance Act, (iv) an allowance under the Blind Persons Act, (v) an allowance under the Disabled Persons Act, or (vi) a supplemental allowance or cost-of-living bonus provided under the law of the province to recipients of benefit under any of the aforementioned acts; or (c) a recipient of mothers' allowance.



9. Notwithstanding sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 8 there may be included in the reimbursement claim any additional relief payments made by the province or by a municipality to persons described in the said sub-paragraph and the number of persons to whom such payments are made if such persons are unemployed and in need. 10. There shall also be excluded from the reimbursement claim payments made in respect of (a) medical, hospital, nursing, dental and optical care and drugs and dressings, (b) funeral expenses, (c) all travelling expenses except those, if Canada is not contributing thereto under some other arrangement, that are made for the purpose of (i) returning a recipient of unemployment assistance and his dependents, if any, to his normal place of residence under an arrangement to which the municipality or the government of the province to which he is being returned has agreed in advance, (ii) enabling a recipient of unemployment assistance or dependent member of his family to obtain assured employment as certified by the National Employment Service, or (iii) enabling a recipient of unemployment assistance or a dependent member of his family to obtain needed medical, hospital or nursing home care which cannot be provided at his normal place of residence; and (d) the cost of administration. 11. There shall be deducted from the reimbursement claim (a) an amount calculated by multiplying the average per person monthly cost of assistance by -45 per cent of the population, and (b) an amount calculated by multiplying the average per person monthly cost of assistance by the decrease in the number of recipients of mothers' allowances. 12. The average per person monthly cost of assistance shall be calculated by dividing the total of the payments made during the month, as set forth in the reimbursement claim, by the total number of persons, including dependents, who received assistance during the said month as set forth in the reimbursement claim. 13. For the purpose of sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 11, the decrease in the number of recipients of mothers' allowances shall be calculated as follows: (a) the average monthly percentage of the population of the province who were recipients of mothers' allowances during each



twelve-month period from the first day of July 1945, to the thirtieth day of June prior to the month to which the reimbursement claim relates shall be determined, and in determining these percentages the latest estimate made by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics and published by the Queen's Printer at Ottawa of the population of the province on the first day of June or nearest date thereto in each twelve-month period shall be used; (b) the average monthly percentage determined for the twelve-month period ending the thirtieth day of June immediately preceding the month to which the reimbursement claim relates shall be subtracted from the highest percentage ascertained pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) of this paragraph in respect of any other twelve-month period; (c) from the difference ascertained pursuant to sub-paragraph (b) of this paragraph there shall be subtracted -10 per cent; (d) the difference ascertained pursuant to sub-paragraph (c) of this paragraph shall be multiplied by the population; and (e) in the event that the calculation in subparagraph (c) of this paragraph results in a negative quantity, sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 11 shall have no application. 14. The reimbursement claim shall (a) be submitted within six (6) months next following the last day of the month to which it relates, but no claim submitted by in respect of any month prior to the actual date on which this agreement is executed shall be disqualified solely on the ground that it was not submitted within the said six (6) months, and (b) contain the following certificate signed by the provincial auditor: "I hereby certify that this claim for reimbursement has been prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement respecting unemployment assistance dated the day of 195 , and made between the Government of Canada and the Government of the province of ". 15. Canada shall, on receipt of a reimbursement claim that has been prepared in accordance with this agreement, pay fifty (50) per cent of the total claim. 16. In the event of any controversy arising between Canada and in respect of this agreement, either party may submit such controversy to the Exchequer Court of Canada for determination. 17. This agreement shall be deemed to have come into force and shall bind the parties from the day of 195 ,to the day of 19 ,11, 1956 Dominion-Provincial Relations and thereafter until terminated by either party giving to the other party one year's notice in writing. 18. Any notice given pursuant to paragraph 17 may be communicated as follows: (a) to Canada, by registered mail addressed to the Minister of National Health and Welfare, at Ottawa; and (b) to by registered mail addressed to the Premier of the province at In Witness Whereof the Honourable Paul Martin, Minister of National Health and Welfare, has hereunto set his hand on behalf of the Government of Canada and the Honourable Minister of of has hereunto set his hand on behalf of the Government of the province of Signed on behalf of the Government of Canada by the Honourable * Minister of in the presence of Signed on behalf of the Government of the province of by the * Honourable Minister of in the presence of Draft agreement as submitted to Nova Scotia on December 5, 1955: (See Clause 11 (a)) Memorandum of Agreement Respecting Unemployment Assistance made this day of 19 . Between: The Government of Canada, hereinafter called "Canada", Of the First Part and The Government of the Province of , hereinafter called Of the Second Part Whereas Canada and are desirous of entering into an agreement for the purpose of providing assistance to unemployed persons who are in need, and for the sharing of the costs thereof; Now, therefore, this agreement witnesseth that in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree each with the other as follows: 1. In this agreement, unless the contrary intention appears, (a) "province" means the province of 28 HOUSE OF Dominion-Provincial Relations (b) "municipality" means a municipal corporation in the province and includes any city, town or local governmental body established under the authority of the law of the province and authorized to administer assistance to unemployed persons who are in need; (c) "a recipient of mother's allowance" includes (i) a dependent child of a person receiving a mother's allowance if such child is within the age group for whom provision is made under the law of the province that provides for the payment of mothers' allowances; and (ii) the husband of a person receiving a mother's allowance if an allowance is being paid on his behalf under the law of the province that provides for the payment of mothers' allowances. (d) "population" means, except in subparagraph (a) of paragraph 13, the most recent estimate of the population of the province made, by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics and published by the Queen's Printer at Ottawa prior to the month to which the reimbursement claim relates; (e) "homes for special care" means nursing homes, hostels for indigent transients, homes for the aged, poor houses, alms houses and hostel facilities provided for the aged within housing projects constructed under the provisions of the National Housing Act; and (f) words in the singular include the plural and words in the plural include the singular. 2. At the first session of Parliament following the execution of this Agreement, Canada shall introduce and recommend the enactment of such legislation as may be required to enable Canada to give effect to this Agreement, and at the first session of the Legislature of the province following the execution of this Agreement shall introduce and recommend the enactment of such legislation as may be required to enable to give effect to this Agreement. 3- shall make all the necessary arrangements for (a) the receipt, by itself or by municipalities, of applications for assistance from unemployed persons in the province, and (b) the verification of the representations made by applicants and the province shall assume responsibility for the correctness of such representations. 4- shall make available to officials of Canada particulars of (a) the conditions prescribed by or by municipalities under which assistance may be given to persons in need, and (b) the rates of assistance payable. .


January 11, 1956