Mr. PERLEY:
Well, that is a further restriction beyond what was in the original bill.
Mr. EULER:
No.
Mr. PERLEY:
Take my own case for example; I have six tenants and am also operating some land myself. If we have
40.000 bushels, which with a reasonable crop we should have, does the minister mean to say that the tenants and I can market only
5.000 bushels?
Mr. EULER:
From one farm or any group of farms operated as a unit there can be sold to the government at 70 cents a bushel only
5.000 bushels.
Mr. PERLEY:
That is quite a restriction that is being placed on the landlord and the tenant.
Mr. EULER:
Just as intended.
Mr. PERLEY:
I was going-
Mr. LAPOINTE (Quebec East):
We are not in committee.
Mr. PERLEY:
I beg pardon; I thought we were.
Mr. SPEAKER:
The hon. member has already spoken more than once.
Mr. ROBICHAUD:
I have a real amendment to offer, instead of one only consequential. It will be recalled that on May 11, when this bill was before the committee of the house, I took the objection that under the law as it stood there was nothing to prevent me-
Mr. SPEAKER:
Order. I think the hon. member is out of order. We are dealing with a motion for concurrence in the senate amendment, and the consequential amendment moved by the Minister of Trade and Commerce.
Mr. ROBICHAUD:
All right, sir, you may put the motion of the minister, but I do not think you can put the motion that the senate amendments be concurred in.
Mr. EULER:
I moved concurrence.
Mr. SPEAKER:
Is it the pleasure of the house to adopt the motion?
No.
Mr. PERLEY:
Mr. Speaker-
Mr. RINFRET:
Surely this is not in order.
Mr. ROBICHAUD:
I want to offer another amendment, because I contend that as the
fMr. Perley.]
bill now stands, there is nothing to prevent me. if I am a producer of 500 bushels of wheat- '
Mr. SPEAKER:
I have declared the motion agreed to.