April 20, 1932

CON

Pierre Édouard Blondin (Speaker of the Senate)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. SPEAKER:

The hon. member is not accused of violating any rules. I gave my ruling in respect to question No. 6 and I do not propose to enter into any discussion with him with respect to it.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. BEAUBIEN
Permalink
LIB-PRO
?

Some hon. MEMBERS:

Order.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. BEAUBIEN
Permalink
CON

Pierre Édouard Blondin (Speaker of the Senate)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. SPEAKER:

The question is no longer r a the order paper.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. BEAUBIEN
Permalink
LIB-PRO

MONTREAL POSTAL TERMINAL


On the orders of the day:


LIB

Louis Édouard Fernand Rinfret

Liberal

Hon. FERNAND RINFRET (St. James):

Mr. Speaker, I should like to renew the question to the Minister of Public Works that I put to him earlier in the session. Has he now any information to give the house concerning the building of the new postal terminal in Montreal? If I am in order, I would urge that the government proceed with the work as soon as possible.

Topic:   MONTREAL POSTAL TERMINAL
Permalink
CON

Henry Herbert Stevens (Minister of Trade and Commerce)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. STEVENS:

You are not in order.

Topic:   MONTREAL POSTAL TERMINAL
Permalink
CON

Hugh Alexander Stewart (Minister of Public Works)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Hon. H. A. STEWART (Minister of Public Works):

I am sorry that I cannot give my hon. friend any more definite information. He has no doubt observed an item in the estimates that would be applicable to this work, but whether we will proceed with it this year or not is still undecided.

Topic:   MONTREAL POSTAL TERMINAL
Permalink

PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE


On the orders of the day:


CON

Charles Herbert Dickie

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. C. H. DICKIE (Nanaimo):

Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of privilege with respect to some impressions which may have been conves'ed to the house in a speech made by the hon. member for New Westminster (Mr. Reid) yesterday.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
?

Some hon. MEMBERS:

Order.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
CON

Charles Herbert Dickie

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. DICKIE:

In dealing with an excerpt which I read from the report of the commission inquiring into unemployment relief matters in British Columbia he said:

The hon. member for Nanaimo (Mr. Dickie) saw fit to read a report wThich purported to emanate from Victoria.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
CON

Pierre Édouard Blondin (Speaker of the Senate)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. SPEAKER:

Order. I do not think the hon. member is in order in treating that as a. question o.f privilege. He is contradicting at speech made by another hon. member, and, as I see it, this is not in any sense a question of privilege.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
CON

Charles Herbert Dickie

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. DICKIE:

It is a question of personal privilege, Mr. Speaker, in that he claims I misrepresented matters.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
CON

Pierre Édouard Blondin (Speaker of the Senate)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. SPEAKER:

If the hon. member for Nanaimo wishes to correct something said by himself-

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
CON

Charles Herbert Dickie

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. DICKIE:

Not at all, Mr. Speaker. I wish to correct something said by the hon. member for New Westminster.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink
CON

Pierre Édouard Blondin (Speaker of the Senate)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. SPEAKER:

That is not a question of privilege.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE-MR. DICKIE
Permalink

April 20, 1932