I was just about to make the same suggestion as my hon. friend for St. John. It is possible that the Dominion analyst was wrong when he gave the certifi-
Narcotic Drugs Act
cate and a man could bring a perfectly good analyst to prove that he was wrong, but a'c*-cording to this section that evidence would not be admissible. I think provision should be made whereby it would be admissible. It says now that the certificate "shall be accepted as evidence." I do not see how you could get around that.