The interpretation put on it by lumbermen is that when any pulpwood is cut on that limit it would be cut subject to the regulations made by the department, and the licensee would have the first rights. He has the best right to the timber subject to the regulations.
In regard to section 52, I find that the officer in charge of the tim-
ber branch bas suggested some change in the wording. So we might say that section 52 shall stand for further consideration.
In connection with the description of the area within which we desire to have the pre-emption clause applied, the member for Saskatchewan (Mr. McCraney) suggested an adjustment of the eastern boundary. I would like to move a provision that would somewhat alter both the eastern and western boundaries, so that it would be before the committee for consideration when the Bill comes again. That relates to sections 27 and 28. The difference is that on the east side it is desired to use the third meridian. We leave the line of the third meridian going north. As it is proposed in this amendment, we continue on the third meridian instead of changing to the Saskatchewan river, and take the north line of township 44 throughout the whole district, from the third meridian to the Calgary and Edmonton Railway line, then take the Calgary and Edmonton Railway line for the western boundary until we reach the west line of range 26, and then follow the international boundary.
Commencing where the west line of range 26 west of the fourth principal meridian intersects the international boundary, thence east along the international boundary to its intersection with the Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste Marie Railway, thence north west along the said railway line to its junction with the main line of the Canadian Pacific Railway, thence west along the Canadian Pacific Railway to the third principal meridian, thence north along the third principal meridian to the north line of township U, thence west along the north line of township 44 to the Calgary & Edmonton Railway, thence south along' the Calgary & Edmonton Railway to its intersection with the west line of range 26 west of the fourth principal meridian, thence south along the west line of said range 26 to the international boundary.
That is the only amendment I desire to move but my hon. friend from Dauphin (Mr. Burrows) and my hon. friend from Selkirk (Mr. Jackson) spoke of another amendment which they will have an opportunity of moving, I presume, when we take this up in committee.
Yes, I would ask the committee to revert to section 9 for the purpos^ of making, in subsection 3, the same provision with regard to including the width of road allowances in reference to the vicinity as we agreed to make in a section later on. I move that after the word ' miles ' in the seventh line of subsection 3 of section 9 to insert the words ' in a direct line exclusive of the width of the road allowances crossed in the measurement.'
Before the House adjourns, I would like to call your attention to the report of my remarks yesterday in connection with the Civil Service Bill. Speaking of the proposed increase in the salaries of the civil service, I am reported as follows :
The present Bill does not deal with that subject except in so far as it may be dealt with in the last section. I do not think it is one which should engage the attention of the government this session.
The last sentence is an entirely inaccurate statement of what I said. I expressly and distinctly stated that this subject should engage the attention of the government this session. May I ask what business will be taken up on Monday?