June 5, 1908

LIB

William Pugsley (Minister of Public Works)

Liberal

Mr. PUGSLEY.

I am quite satisfied that that return was brought down some weeks ago.

Topic:   INQUIRIES FOR RETURNS.
Permalink
CON

Alfred Alexander Lefurgey

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. LEFURGEY.

I went to the return room yesterday morning, and wag told that the return had not yet come down.

Topic:   INQUIRIES FOR RETURNS.
Permalink
LIB

William Pugsley (Minister of Public Works)

Liberal

Mr. PUGSLEY.

I find by the Votes and Proceedings, on page 1015, that that return was brought down on the 26th of May.

Topic:   INQUIRIES FOR RETURNS.
Permalink
CON

Alfred Alexander Lefurgey

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. LEFURGEY.

I would like to ask the hon. Minister of Railways and Canals when we may expect the return that was promised early in the session in regard to the investigation of the tunnel matter.

Topic:   INQUIRIES FOR RETURNS.
Permalink
LIB

George Perry Graham (Minister of Railways and Canals)

Liberal

Mr. GRAHAM.

I think my hon. friend will remember that it was not a report oi an investigation, but a return of certain information that the chief engineer had been compiling on the subject. I might say that so far nothing very definite concerning the tunnel has been found. I will make inquiry about it.

Topic:   INQUIRIES FOR RETURNS.
Permalink

ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.

CON

Frederick Debartzch Monk

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. MONK.

I would like to call the attention of the government to a very urgent and important matter.

Topic:   ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.
Permalink
LIB

Robert Franklin Sutherland (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER.

It is only for the purpose of asking a question ?

Topic:   ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.
Permalink
CON

Frederick Debartzch Monk

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. MONK.

Only for the purpose of asking a question. Information has reached me from a reliable source to the effect that there is $8,000 worth of whisky in bond in charge of the customs at Thetford Mines belonging to F. X. Labranche of Megantic, and the whisky is being distributed in the counties of Beauce and Megantic without duty being paid. My information is to the effect that the whisky is out of the possession of Mr. Labranche and that he is not a consenting party to this operation. I would like to ask the government if they have any knowledge of these acts, and if they will take immediate steps to check this violation of the law if it exists.

Topic:   ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.
Permalink
LIB

William Stevens Fielding (Minister of Finance and Receiver General)

Liberal

Mr. FIELDING.

Is my hon. friend in a position to give the source of his information ? Such charges are almost invariably denied, and if we had the source of the information, it would facilitate inquiry.

Topic:   ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.
Permalink
CON

Frederick Debartzch Monk

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. MONK.

My information comes from a very reliable source, and I will have no objection, when my hon. friend is through, to communicate it to him.

Topic:   ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.
Permalink
LIB

William Stevens Fielding (Minister of Finance and Receiver General)

Liberal

Mr. FIELDING.

If my hon. friend will send me the name privately, I will make inquiry of the Customs Department at once. I think that there must be a mistake; or that the information is incorrect, because I cannot imagine that the customs authorities would permit such a thing as my hon. friend has mentioned.

Topic:   ILLEGAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHISKY.
Permalink

SUPPLY-CHARGE OF OBSTRUCTION.


Mr. FIELDING moved that the House go into Committee of Supply.


CON

Charles Lewis Owen

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. C. L. OWEN (East Northumberland).

Mr. Speaker, before you leave the chair, I wish to bring to the notice of the government a report in that great Reform newspaper, the Toronto ' Globe.' That paper does sometimes sin a little in reporting the sayings of hon. members on this side of the House, but I admit that it is always very accurate when reporting the sayings of hon. members on the government side. Therefore I take this report as being correct. It is a report of a political meeting held on Wednesday evening in the city of Brantford, where the hon. Minister of Customs, Mr. Paterson, is reported to have said :

In his department there were 1,800 men who could not get their pay because the Tory obstructionists would not vote supplies.

gome hon. MEMBERS. Hear, hear.

Topic:   SUPPLY-CHARGE OF OBSTRUCTION.
Permalink
CON

Charles Lewis Owen

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. OWEN.

The Hon. William Paterson knew, when he stated upon the hustings in the city of Brantford, that his supplies had been voted by this House before he left Ottawa on Monday evening for Brantford. Therefore it was very unjust and unfair for him to endeavour to mislead the people in his own city by making them believe that

we would not vote him supply required to pay the men in his department.

Topic:   SUPPLY-CHARGE OF OBSTRUCTION.
Permalink
LIB
CON

Charles Lewis Owen

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. OWEN.

I am coming to that in a few moments. I notice also that the employees in the postal service have been finding fault because their salaries haye not been paid. If I take the Toronto ' World ' -and that good paper is generally correct -I see that the whole amount of the post office supply was voted the 22nd May last -the full amount of over $5,000,000. I am given to understand that the trouble is that the government have not brought down their Supply Bill, and until that Bill is brought down this money cannot be paid out in salaries. It is very unfair and unjust for a minister of the Crown to go around the country trying to make the people believe that the opposition are obstructing.

Topic:   SUPPLY-CHARGE OF OBSTRUCTION.
Permalink
?

An hon. MEMBER.

What are you doing now ?

Topic:   SUPPLY-CHARGE OF OBSTRUCTION.
Permalink

June 5, 1908